Never miss an update Follow AppleInsider
Tuesday, January 25, 2005, 07:00 pm
Apple releases Security Update 2005-001
Apple on Tuesday evening released Security Update 2005-001, which delivers a number of security enhancements and is recommended for all Macintosh users.The software is available through Software Update or from Apple's download site and includes updates to the following components: at commands, ColorSync, libxml2, Mail, PHP, and Safari.
Full details of the release are available from Apple's security web site.
Today's' Headlines
-
No news headlines yet today
On Topic: General
- Steve Jobs discusses his legacy in rare 1994 video interview
- Solar charging stations with Apple Lightning & 30-pin connectors come to New York
- Briefly: Jony Ive's title at Apple shortened to 'SVP of Design'
- DOJ e-books trial: Apple's Cue explains 'agency' contracts and pricing, denies culpability
- Skype Video Messages come to Apple's iOS, OS X
Related Articles
- Apple pushes out OS X Lion, Snow Leopard security patches after Mountain Lion update
- Apple adds security enhancements to Java 6 in latest update
- Apple software update brings QuickTime for Windows to 7.7.4
- Apple releases OS X 10.8.4 with Wi-Fi & Exchange improvements
- Twitter unveils two-factor authentication, updates Mac app with Notification Center support
Previous Comments View All
2005/01/26 12:32am
Quote:
Originally posted by drumsticks
Any reason for the new numbering system?
Any reason for the new numbering system?
Probably to make the numbering easier to follow (i.e. if you see 2005-004, you know its the 4th update for the year, while 2005-03-30 tells us nothing except its from the 30th).
2005/01/26 06:30am
Has it been withdrawn? doesn't appear in Software Update (10.3.7) and can't find on Apple UK's os x downloads page.
2005/01/26 06:37am
Quote:
Originally posted by Louzer
Probably to make the numbering easier to follow (i.e. if you see 2005-004, you know its the 4th update for the year, while 2005-03-30 tells us nothing except its from the 30th).
Probably to make the numbering easier to follow (i.e. if you see 2005-004, you know its the 4th update for the year, while 2005-03-30 tells us nothing except its from the 30th).
The previous numbering scheme told us the update's release date. Year-Month-Day
For example: http://Security Update 2004-12-02 v....10.2.8 Client) was released on December 2, 2004
You can confim this by clicking the link to this update's information page and checking the Post Date in the information box at the top right hand side of the page.
Much more informatitive than the new numbering scheme. IMO.
2005/01/26 07:55am
Quote:
Originally posted by ezzie
Has it been withdrawn? doesn't appear in Software Update (10.3.7) and can't find on Apple UK's os x downloads page.
Has it been withdrawn? doesn't appear in Software Update (10.3.7) and can't find on Apple UK's os x downloads page.
Now seems to be available through software update.
2005/01/26 09:58am
is this update working fine? i don't want to install it if it might screw something up.
2005/01/26 12:51pm
Quote:
Originally posted by mattjohndrow
is this update working fine? i don't want to install it if it might screw something up.
is this update working fine? i don't want to install it if it might screw something up.
Fine so far on an iMac G5(10.3.7). Nothing noticably different.
2005/01/26 01:11pm
Quote:
Originally posted by fahlman
The previous numbering scheme told us the update's release date. Year-Month-Day
For example: http://Security Update 2004-12-02 v....10.2.8 Client) was released on December 2, 2004
You can confim this by clicking the link to this update's information page and checking the Post Date in the information box at the top right hand side of the page.
Much more informatitive than the new numbering scheme. IMO.
The previous numbering scheme told us the update's release date. Year-Month-Day
For example: http://Security Update 2004-12-02 v....10.2.8 Client) was released on December 2, 2004
You can confim this by clicking the link to this update's information page and checking the Post Date in the information box at the top right hand side of the page.
Much more informatitive than the new numbering scheme. IMO.
Dates are unimportant. Who cares that the security update came out 12-02, when you have to go looking to see if there's any from November, October, etc. By numbering, you know "Hey, there were 32 security patches in 2002". And, as you say, its easy to get the post date from the internet.
It also probably aids in cutting the confusion for which the "v1.0" part at the end, which is one of those "Hey, we screwed up the original update, so on 2004-12-09 we're release Security Update 2004-12-02 v1.1" So, you see, the date isn't necessarily the date of release, its the date of the original patch, not the update (and, yes, they've done this).
Unless you're not the type to be confused by the statement "You need to download the 2004-12-02 patch that was posted on the 9th."
2005/01/27 08:55pm
Quote:
It also probably aids in cutting the confusion for which the "v1.0" part at the end, which is one of those "Hey, we screwed up the original update, so on 2004-12-09 we're release Security Update 2004-12-02 v1.1" So, you see, the date isn't necessarily the date of release, its the date of the original patch, not the update (and, yes, they've done this).
That was probably the reason why they did that. I remember when I had to reinstall 10.2 and 10.3 on my computers, and when I applied the security updates I ended up confused on which to install first (or which one to install at all) when I had multiple versions of the same security update floating around in my downloads folder.
BTW, I applied the updates to my iBook G3/700 and my DP G4/1.25 Power Mac. No problems to report at all.
2005/01/27 11:16pm
My rev a G5 2x2.0 is working fine with 10.3.7 and the security patch.
Tomorrow I'll install it on my Ti and our iBook and see how it fares.
Latest Apple Headlines
-
High resolution images claim to show 'iPhone 5S' and iPhone 5 display assemblies side-by-side
~2 hours ago -
Steve Jobs discusses his legacy in rare 1994 video interview
~5 hours ago -
Briefly: Sprint LTE service expands to 22 more areas
~7 hours ago -
Facebook for iOS adds privacy options and status icons in update
~8 hours ago -
Google's Nexus 7 tablets dying early, possibly due to cheap memory
~8 hours ago - more...
Lowest Prices Anywhere!
| Model | Price | You Save |
|---|---|---|
| 11"1.3GHz/4GB/128GB | $964.18* | $34.82 |
| 11" 1.3GHz/8GB/128GB | $1,061.18* | $37.82 |
| 11" 1.3GHz/8GB/256GB | $1,255.18* | $43.82 |
| 11"1.7GHz/8GB/128GB | $1,206.68* | $42.32 |
| 11"1.7GHz/8GB/256GB | $1,400.68* | $48.32 |
| 11" 1.7GHz/8GB/512GB | $1,691.68* | $57.32 |
| 13" 1.3GHz/4GB/128GB | $1,061.18* | $37.82 |
| 13" 1.3GHz/4GB/256GB | $1,255.18* | $43.82 |
| 13" 1.3GHz/8GB/256GB | $1,352.18* | $46.82 |
| 13" 1.3GHz/8GB/512GB | $1,643.18* | $46.82 |
| 13" 1.7GHz/8GB/256GB | $1,497.00* | $52.00 |
| 13" 1.7GHz/8GB/512GB | $1,788.68* | $60.32 |
* price with Promo Code:
APPLEINSIDER01
|
||
| Click for even more configurations | ||
Active Forum Topics
-
After crowning Samsung as Apple's heir, analysts now rethinking their math
133
-
Apple issues rare public comment on its 'commitment to customer privacy'
73
-
Editorial: What WWDC 2013 tells us about Apple
44
-
Apple defense to take over in final days of e-book antitrust case
32
-
Purported 'iPhone 5S' logic board has tweaked screw placement, lacks CPU
30
- more...
| Model | White | Black | |
|---|---|---|---|
| iPad mini (WiFi only) | |||
| 16GB WiFi | $329.00 | $329.00 | |
| 32GB WiFi | $429.00 | $429.00 | |
| 64GB WiFi | $529.00 | $529.00 | |
| iPad mini (WiFi + 4G) | |||
![]() |
|||
| 16GB 4G White | $459.00 | $459.00 | $459.00 |
| 32GB 4G White | $559.00 | $539.99 | $559.00 |
| 64GB 4G White | $659.00 | $659.00 | $629.99 |
| 16GB 4G Black | $459.00 | $459.00 | $459.00 |
| 32GB 4G Black | $559.00 | $539.99 | $539.99 |
| 64GB 4G Black | $659.00 | $659.00 | $629.99 |



Want to write for AppleInsider? Submit your application now!


Any reason for the new numbering system?