Neil Hughes
Details of the survey from RBC/ChangeWave were released Tuesday by RBC Capital Markets analyst Mike Abramsky. He said the responses from 3,200 participants show strong pent-up consumer demand for the iPad, which could bode well for Apple's new product.
One of the strongest assets for the iPad is its $499 starting price. While 28 percent of respondents in 2007 said the iPhone was too expensive, only 8 percent in 2010 said they would not buy the iPad based on its price. In addition, while 19 percent said they are interested in the $499, 16GB model, another 19 percent said they would opt for the high-end, $829, 64GB model with 3G.
The survey also found that lack of a camera, support for Adobe Flash, or multitasking have not had a significant impact on buyer interest. Most consumers plan on using the iPad for a variety of functions, suggesting it will serve as more of a netbook than e-reader. Of those surveyed, 68 percent said they would surf the Internet with the iPad, 44 percent would check e-mail, and 37 percent are interested in reading e-books.
The survey also found the iPad will also have an effect on sales of other Mac products: 25 percent of respondents said they will delay planned purchases of one or more Apple products due to the iPad. MacBook purchases will be delayed by 9 percent of respondents, while 10 percent were prospective iPhone buyers that will now postpone their purchase.
The survey's positive outlook for the iPad led Abramsky to maintain its prediction of 5 million units sold in the calendar year 2010, resulting in $2.4 billion in revenue and 33 cents earnings per share.
"This data, while preliminary, suggests iPad may have greater potential than expected, to expand Apple's addressable PC, iPod markets and to capture a segment of the home PC market," Abramsky wrote.
RBC Capital Markets has reiterated its outperform rating for AAPL stock, and has maintained a price target of $275.
Charles Martin
Wesley Hilliard
Marko Zivkovic
Malcolm Owen
Andrew Orr
Christine McKee
-xl-m.jpg)
190 Comments
Was there ever any doubt that demand would be high?
Was there ever any doubt that demand would be high?
Not in my mind.
I'm glad I decided to go with 32g WiFi only as it seems demand will be lower for that model overall.
The iPad is going to be HUGE.
This is not just a big iTouch. Developers who tried to shrink desktop apps down to the iPhone in 2007 failed, because it was a new paradigm requiring a new kind of app. Three years later we take it for granted but an iPhone app is unlike anything that came before.
The iPad builds on that paradigm, but developers who do nothing more than blow up an iPhone app will not be well received in the marketplace. Look at the difference between iPhone calendar and iPad calendar for example. Or photos.
iPad has the real estate to break away from the one screen per task rule required by the iPhone's small screen. Yet at the same time it keeps the best features - intuitive touch selection and navigation, no file system details to confuse grandma, etc etc
My friends, the Great Experiment... the iPad, ready for trial runs.
This is the future.The potential of the iPad platform is insane. It was apparent from the first minute it was demo'd by Jobs.
Right after, Future Shock hit everyone like runaway train.
"The survey also found that lack of a camera, support for Adobe Flash, or multitasking have not had a significant impact on buyer interest."
But resident trolls like iGenius and TEKSTUD say the lack of these features are deal killers and the iPad will fail miserably without them. This survey must be wrong. Right? Or are the trolls just urinating into a headwind?