Content from Random House began populating the iBooks application on Wednesday, just hours before Apple is set to unveil its second-generation iPad. Some rumors have suggested that the new device will have an improved display with superior anti-reflective properties, allowing for easier reading of content like e-books in sunlight.
When the iBooks application launched last April, Random House was the most noteworthy absence from Apple's new digital storefront. Other major publishers, including HarperCollins, Hachette, Penguin, Macmillan and Simon & Schuster made their content available from day one.
Random House's content is able to be sold on the iBookstore now because the world's largest publisher announced on Monday that it had adopted the "agency mode" for e-book sales in the U.S. That model allows Random House to set consumer prices for e-books it publishes, and provides retailers with a commission for each sale.
Apple takes a 30 percent cut of all content sold on the iBookstore, just as the company does with applications sold on the App Store. Random House content was previously available on the iPad only through the Amazon Kindle application and separate storefront.
Apple's agency approach allows publishers to set the prices paid by consumers. Random House executives were concerned that adopting the agency model would lead to considerably lower prices and profits.
12 Comments
I prefer the iBooks reader to the Kindle one but since Kindle is on my Mac and iPad I buy from them. Actually I prefer to read paper books, I mainly buy digital copies after I've read the paper one to allow for keyword searching of memorable passages, which is why having it on the computer is useful, because it's not all about having a book-like device.
I prefer the iBooks reader to the Kindle one but since Kindle is on my Mac and iPad I buy from them. Actually I prefer to read paper books, I mainly buy digital copies after I've read the paper one to allow for keyword searching of memorable passages, which is why having it on the computer is useful, because it's not all about having a book-like device.
Which is why so many people are still wondering why it's (ibooks) not on the mac app store yet.
$9.99 for a old book. Please...
Which is why so many people are still wondering why it's (ibooks) not on the mac app store yet.
I think that for me it's because having Kindle on every device known to man is straightforward, sensible and simple for Amazon to accomplish. It takes little effort, and if it rakes in an extra 1% of sales it's probably worth it. But reading extended text on a monitor is not something I enjoy, although with the iPad at least I can basically recline and slouch how I would with a real book - I can't do that with my iMac. So Amazon do it because they can, not because it's particularly required. I can see it being more useful for browsing the catalogue and downloading perhaps. I'm in no rush to see iBooks on Mac, even though I prefer it to Kindle on the iPad (mainly because of the dumb screen dim controls in Kindle, which they may have fixed now, but it's too late, I'm not splitting my collection over multiple libraries)
And now I see The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo at last.