Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Intel launches Oak Trail tablet chip in attempt to catch iPad

The latest leg in Intel's 'mobile marathon' has come in the form of the newly launched Oak Trail tablet chip from the company as it attempts to catch the current leader, Apple.

Intel formally launched the new Atom chip, codenamed Oak Trail, which is built specifically for tablet computers on Monday, alongside the news that 35 tablet and "hybrid" computers are slated to make use of the chip, the Associated Press reports.

"You won't find a lot of Intel based tablets on the shelves at the moment," the BBC reported Kevin O'Donovan, Intel's marketing manager for notebooks and tablets, as saying. "2011 is about becoming relevant."

The first tablets implementing the new 45nm-process chip are expected to launch in May.

The tablet chip, which will retail under the name Z670, takes its place as the next step in a long-term "marathon" that Intel sees itself running. Last fall, CEO Paul Otellini reassured employees in a company-wide memo that Intel would eventually triumph in the tablet and smartphone markets, just as it did with servers.

"Winning an architectural contest can take time…," said Otellini. “I am also very optimistic about our opportunity in tablets and smartphones, even though we are not first to market with a solution. Ultimately, we can and will lead.”

However, some industry watchers are skeptical about Intel's late arrival to the market.

"I think they have got some serious challenges," said Gartner research director Michael Gartenberg. "They continue to beat the drum of performance, but in reality, I don't think there are a lot of people running around complaining about how slow their tablets are. They seem to be quite happy with the Arm architecture."

Despite having an 80 percent market share of laptops and desktop PCs, Intel has struggled with its mobile offerings. In October, the company conceded that sales of the iPad had "nibbled away" at PC sales margins and had had some effect on revenues.

The world's largest chipmaker also indicated plans to release a smartphone processor later this year, though it has yet to release specifications. Intel attempted to buy its way into mobile with its _to_acquire_iphone_chipmaker_infineon_for_1_4_billion.html">$1.4 billion purchase of German chipmaker Infineon, which provides the baseband chip for the GSM version of the iPhone 4. According to Gartner, Infineon owned about 5 percent of the market for mobile phone processors and communications chips.

For years, rumors suggested that Apple would transition the iPhone to the Atom architecture, but the change failed to materialize as Intel struggled with managing power consumption.

Rival chip designer ARM Holdings went on record last November saying it is not worried about Intel catching up in the tablet market. “[Intel's] Atom designs are just not good enough in terms of power consumption [right now]. Intel knows this,” said CEO Warren East.

Buoyed by runaway sales of the iPhone and iPad, ARM announced record revenue and earnings last quarter. ARM provides processor designs for Apple's A5 System on a Chip, which powers the iPad 2 and is expected to make its way into the next-generation iPhone later this year.

50 Comments

addicted44 18 Years · 830 comments

Intel is going about this the wrong way. The reason they were able to win in all the other areas is because people knew how to develop for x86. The legacy applications built on x86 gave Intel a huge edge.

In mobile, its the complete opposite. Legacy code (and more relevantly, instruction sets) are anathema, because battery life, and not processing power, is king in this space.

If Intel really wants to become relevant, they need to invest a ton of money developing better battery technology, so the inefficient power consumption of x86 chips, vis a vis ARM chips, is not relevant anymore. Only after Intel is able to move the discussion away from battery life, to speed and performance, will x86 even stand a chance against ARM.

suddenly newton 15 Years · 13819 comments

I'm all for Intel attempting to win through improvements in performance, rather than simply walking into the room and saying, "we're Intel, so we win." if they can bring the silicon to beat ARM-based processors, then bring it on! If they can't, they still get to sell lots of these things to their partners in mediocrity, namely Dell, Acer, and Asus netbooks.

suddenly newton 15 Years · 13819 comments

Love these Intel code names. "Oak Trail"? What are they selling? Granola bars?

zunx 21 Years · 619 comments

This is great news, since it will allow to make a truly portable Mac. I mean, 400 to 600 g. 7 inches.

lord anubis 17 Years · 25 comments

Any 1000 pieces price target available?