Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Samsung fails to convince court to stay Galaxy Tab injunction

Last updated

Samsung has been unsuccessful in a bid to have an Apple-sought injunction against its Galaxy Tab 10.1 put on hold while it appeals the ban.

Reuters reported on Monday that a district court in the U.S. denied the South Korean electronics maker's request. Samsung had hoped to have the injunction put off until its appeal had been heard.

Judge Lucy Koh handed down the Galaxy Tab injunction last week after Apple won an appeal to have a design patent reevaluated for validity. Though Koh had ruled that the patent in question was obvious, the appeals court reversed the decision and paved the way for the injunction.

Samsung will still have a shot at having the injunction lifted via the appeal it filed with a federal appeals court.

In addition to the Galaxy Tab 10.1 ban, Samsung was hit with an injunction against its Galaxy Nexus smartphone last week. The sales ban is a heavy blow to Samsung, as the Galaxy Nexus is the flagship device for the Ice Cream Sandwich release of Android and one of the company's top-selling smartphones.

Some industry sources have suggested that Samsung could lose as much as $60 million from the Galaxy Tab injunction and $120 million from the Galaxy Nexus ban.

Samsung's situation has become sufficiently dire that the company announced it was "working closely" with Google to defend itself. Though Google publicly declared support for its partners at the start of the legal confrontation between Apple and several prominent Android vendors, the company had stopped short of a declaration of support for Samsung in the past.


Topeka Capital Markets analyst Brian White said on Monday that Samsung could have "big problems on its hands" if Apple succeeds in a third injunction against the company. Apple took aim at the new Galaxy S III shortly after it was announced, but Judge Koh said she couldn't fit the device into the near-term schedule.

Recent developments in Apple's legal disputes have begun to give shape to late co-founder Steve Jobs' vow to "destroy" Google Android. According to Jobs' biographer, the executive promised to go "thermonuclear war" on the rival operating system because he felt Google had betrayed his company and stolen its innovations. Apple's current CEO Tim Cook has been less dramatic in his public statements about the litigation, but he has repeatedly voiced a strong commitment to defending the company's intellectual property.



44 Comments

🎄
tallest skil 14 Years · 43086 comments

"What do they care? They're two versions on now; this one is worthless to everyone."

🎁
solipsismx 13 Years · 19562 comments

[VIDEO]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZK1HlsISs78[/VIDEO]

🎄
nagromme 22 Years · 2831 comments

Samsung is profitable and will survive this setback. And consumers will get something good out of it: products that are more original! More variety and choice in the market. Less lazy following/copying. Other companies besides Samsung may be pushed in that direction too for fear of legal costs—and with any luck that will mean more Microsoft-style innovation in the tablet/touch market! (Would have sounded crazy in years past, but these days it’s true! Surface + Windows 8 is a response to Apple that wouldn’t have happened without the iPhone and iPad, but they are NOT me-too lazy copycats.)

 

Quote:
Originally Posted by SolipsismX 

Ha! (I love everything Mitchell and Webb EXCEPT the snookers thing. Ah well, I’m not British.)

🌟
drealoth 19 Years · 78 comments

Good.

 

I consider myself both technically savvy and pretty up to date with technology, and I mistook the Galaxy Tab for an iPad at first glance ("That's a strange looking iPad... wait a second, that's not an iPad at all!"). It's a complete knock-off. Other Android tablet manufacturers have proven that they can manufacture tablets without being derivative (look at Asus's Transformer series - oh how I would love for Apple to do something like that with the MacBook Air).

 

I'm a pretty reasonable guy, and I am not a fan of software patents or really even patents in general. While I'm not too happy with the Galaxy Nexus injunction, Samsung deserves everything that they get with the Galaxy Tab.

❄️
sflocal 16 Years · 6139 comments

Samsung getting EXACTY what it deservers.  An epic smack-down.  I hope this serves as a lesson to all copyists that unless you're prepared to go all the way legally and just let the lawyers get rich, be prepared to do your own products and not use Apple as your R&D department.

Crossing fingers tightly that the Galaxy/Nexus phones are next on the chopping block!