Apple formalizes ban on non-official coronavirus apps in App Store

Apple's App Store guidelines for developers have been updated to explicitly state that only apps from official health organization accounts may develop coronavirus resources for distribution.

After multiple developers complained about their apps being rejected for being related to coronavirus, Apple has released an update regarding the ban. The update issued by Apple on Saturday afternoon is clear about what it will allow to be distributed.

The App Store should always be a safe and trusted place for users to download apps. Now more than ever that commitment takes on special significance as the world fights the COVID-19 pandemic. Communities around the world are depending on apps to be credible news sources — helping users understand the latest health innovations, find out where they can get help if needed or provide assistance to their neighbors.
To help fulfill these expectations, we're evaluating apps critically to ensure data sources are reputable and that developers presenting these apps are from recognized entities such as government organizations, health-focused NGOs, companies deeply credentialed in health issues, and medical or educational institutions. Only developers from one of these recognized entities should submit an app related to COVID-19.

Apple also re-emphasized the fact that non-profit organizations can get their annual developer fee waived. If the organization is nonprofit, and plans on a free app, Apple will waive the fee if they are in an eligible country.

Also noted is the ability for these specific developers to flag their app as "Time-Sensitive Event" to expedite their app review. This is done in case of emergencies like this where timely distribution of accurate information is critical to the people involved.

The new guideline bans any use of "COVID-19" or "coronavirus" in titles of entertainment apps. Only apps released by an official entity under the health and information category may release coronavirus related content on the App Store.

Apple has taken a strong public stance with aid and information surrounding coronavirus this past weeks from a dedicated Apple News special coverage section, to public donations. AppleInsider has continuous coverage of the coronavirus outbreak as it develops, and will update as Apple continues to deal with it.

Latest Exclusives

Latest comparisons

11 Comments

lkrupp 19 Years · 10521 comments

About 4 years ago

Good! And to hell with the "alternative truths" and "competing information" baloney. We already have enough of that from the anti-vaccer crowd, the flat earthers, and creation "science" idiots. And if you say you can't trust the CDC, the NIH, and the WHO then you can't trust anybody and you're hopeless. What you read on internet blogs is usually about 99% nonsensical idiocy., period.

seanismorris 8 Years · 1624 comments

lkrupp said:

Good! And to hell with the "alternative truths" and "competing information" baloney. We already have enough of that from the anti-vaccer crowd, the flat earthers, and creation "science" idiots. And if you say you can't trust the CDC, the NIH, and the WHO then you can't trust anybody and you're hopeless. What you read on internet blogs is usually about 99% nonsensical idiocy., period.

Wait...

Are you saying the world isn’t flat?

You probably think the world is shaped like an Apple then...

; )

wizard69 21 Years · 13358 comments

lkrupp said:

Good! And to hell with the "alternative truths" and "competing information" baloney. We already have enough of that from the anti-vaccer crowd, the flat earthers, and creation "science" idiots. And if you say you can't trust the CDC, the NIH, and the WHO then you can't trust anybody and you're hopeless. What you read on internet blogs is usually about 99% nonsensical idiocy., period.

That is all well and good but you really should wake up and look at WHO’s behavior in China over the last couple of months. If you can honestly say you trust WHO after reasonable research you have a problem. Between a corrupt reporting system in China and WHO’s willingness to accept what the government in China feed them, we really don’t know how deadly this infection is. This isn’t anti science as much as it is a humbling government in China and the WHO’s inability to deal with that problem.

Beyond all of that we must not forget that even the CDC and NIH can be wrong. This simply because so little is known about the disease at the moment.

wizard69 said:

lkrupp said:

Good! And to hell with the "alternative truths" and "competing information" baloney. We already have enough of that from the anti-vaccer crowd, the flat earthers, and creation "science" idiots. And if you say you can't trust the CDC, the NIH, and the WHO then you can't trust anybody and you're hopeless. What you read on internet blogs is usually about 99% nonsensical idiocy., period.

That is all well and good but you really should wake up and look at WHO’s behavior in China over the last couple of months. If you can honestly say you trust WHO after reasonable research you have a problem. Between a corrupt reporting system in China and WHO’s willingness to accept what the government in China feed them, we really don’t know how deadly this infection is. This isn’t anti science as much as it is a humbling government in China and the WHO’s inability to deal with that problem.
Beyond all of that we must not forget that even the CDC and NIH can be wrong. This simply because so little is known about the disease at the moment.

The professionals may be wrong sometimes but they're all we have. And you are NEVER going to get the truth by slugging through the disgusting pile of dung known as the internet where anonymous 'experts' hold court.