Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple's online store could be more expensive for UK customers in the future

Apple Store on Regent Street, London

Last updated

The UK government is reviving discussions about applying a 2% online sales tax, with the intention of making brick-and-mortar stores more competitive versus online offerings.

Online retailers have been blamed in the past for drawing consumers away from retail outlets in the UK, with COVID-19 making trading conditions worse for physical stores in early 2020. While there is a variety of factors at play, the UK government is looking into plans to level the playing field, by making it more expensive to buy online.

Chancellor Rishi Sunak is examining whether an online sales tax of around 2% on goods sold online would help create a "sustainable and meaningful revenue source for government" by balancing out costs. The Times reports the Treasury was concerned about how high street retailers had the burden of business rates for "high-value" properties that online variants didn't have to pay.

Aside from a possible 2% tax on goods sold, there is also the prospect of an additional tax on consumer deliveries, under the claims it would help curb pollution.

The Treasury is also concerned by COVID-19, advising it needs the government to act to ensure "the tax system raises sufficient revenue."

For Apple, such a sales tax would be puzzling to implement, as it has both physical and online retail in the UK, and has identical pricing across the board. Applying a sales tax to online sales would certainly make its digital operations more expensive to operate, but without changing its online prices to reflect that, there would be no incentive for customers to head to retailers.

If Apple decides to pass the cost of the tax on to consumers, this would mean that online iPhone sales directly from Apple would be more expensive than in stores, once the tax is applied. Even so, consumers would have to weigh up whether the cost saving is worth it compared to the effort of visiting a store, the cost of transportation, and the time required to make the trip.

There has already been some pushback on the proposals from the British Retail Consortium, which represents major online and physical retailers in the UK. "Taxing the sale or delivery of online goods would simply be another burden on an already overtaxed industry, one that would ultimately hit consumer spending through higher prices," said BRC director of business and regulation Tom Ironside to The Guardian.

This would not be the only tax Apple's online sales are affected by in the UK, as a 2% digital services tax commenced in April against UK-derived revenues of major technology companies. While the proposed online retail tax is anticipated to raise in the region of 2 billion GBP ($2.57 billion) annually, the digital services tax revenue is valued at only 300 million GBP ($386 million) for 2020.



13 Comments

darkpaw 16 Years · 212 comments

"Aside from a possible 2% tax on goods sold, there is also the prospect of an additional tax on consumer deliveries, under the claims it would help curb pollution."
More taxes from Chancellor Rishi Sunak... This doesn't affect (hurt) the online retailers at all. Both of these would just increase prices for the consumer who isn't going to change their habits.

No one in the Conservative Party seems to understand that there are solutions to this aside from adding new taxes or increasing existing taxes. You cannot simply point at something and say, "TAX THAT!".

Take this, for example:
"The Times reports the Treasury was concerned about how high street retailers had the burden of business rates for "high-value" properties that online variants didn't have to pay."

And who puts that burden on high street retailers? The government. They have the ability to wipe out business rates for high street retailers, but they won't. To level the playing field, you either wipe out business rates (not gonna happen because of the tax revenue), or you charge online-only retailers the same business rates (an increase in tax revenue).

If Amazon say they "pay all taxes they are legally obliged to pay in the UK", then increase those taxes. Tax the profits they make in this country, but don't raise the price of everything for the consumer.

(I am not a tax lawyer, and happily acknowledge I could be talking BS.)

rotateleftbyte 13 Years · 1630 comments

By all means tax deliveries... if they are made using Petrol/Diesel engined vehicles. That would spur the companies making the last mile deliveries to move to Electric Vehicles. Then the government can put another nail in the coffin of 'Big Oil' and Fossil Fuels. At the time I'm writing this post, almost 50% of the UK Power requirements is coming from Renewable sources (Solar, Wind, Hydro)

3 Likes · 0 Dislikes
DAalseth 7 Years · 3079 comments

The tax advantage of online over brick and mortar stores is part of the reason so many little stores have closed. This has been very damaging to the economy. Amazon is the worst but all of them share the blame. So by all means hit online retailers with a tax, the jobs you save may be your own.

2 Likes · 0 Dislikes
elijahg 19 Years · 2848 comments

darkpaw said:
"Aside from a possible 2% tax on goods sold, there is also the prospect of an additional tax on consumer deliveries, under the claims it would help curb pollution."

More taxes from Chancellor Rishi Sunak... This doesn't affect (hurt) the online retailers at all. Both of these would just increase prices for the consumer who isn't going to change their habits.

No one in the Conservative Party seems to understand that there are solutions to this aside from adding new taxes or increasing existing taxes. You cannot simply point at something and say, "TAX THAT!".

Take this, for example:
"The Times reports the Treasury was concerned about how high street retailers had the burden of business rates for "high-value" properties that online variants didn't have to pay."

And who puts that burden on high street retailers? The government. They have the ability to wipe out business rates for high street retailers, but they won't. To level the playing field, you either wipe out business rates (not gonna happen because of the tax revenue), or you charge online-only retailers the same business rates (an increase in tax revenue).

If Amazon say they "pay all taxes they are legally obliged to pay in the UK", then increase those taxes. Tax the profits they make in this country, but don't raise the price of everything for the consumer.

(I am not a tax lawyer, and happily acknowledge I could be talking BS.)

Actually, Rishi has announced a review of business rates. Possibly putting the onus on the landowner instead, which would likely help. As much as we all hate them we do need taxes, the burden on high street retailers should be the same as the burden on Amazon etc - if Amazon etc shared the burden, the high street retailers would have less on their shoulders.

As you say, to avoid tax being paid by consumers you tax profit instead, but of course multinational companies offset everything they sell with a web of subsidiaries who charge each other, so declared "profit" is near enough zero. The EU made a(nother) big mistake years ago allowing companies to centralise their EU operations and funnel profits to that operation, anyone with the slightest foresight could have worked out that would mean billions for the tax haven of Europe (Luxembourg and Ireland) but nothing for everyone else. And then they tried to backdate the fix by 10 years, and lost in court.  

This all proves that why international tax law needs fixing and profits need to be declared properly in the country of sale. Apple knows exactly how much they're making from each sale in the UK, but legally hides that from HMRC. Apple has billions in offshore profits that they want to repatriate to the US but won't because they have to then pay tax on it, and they don't want to - despite paying essentially zero tax on it in the country the actual sale took place. It's completely unfair that massive multinationals can use tax havens that are entirely unavailable to smaller national companies.

1 Like · 0 Dislikes
crowley 16 Years · 10431 comments

darkpaw said:
"Aside from a possible 2% tax on goods sold, there is also the prospect of an additional tax on consumer deliveries, under the claims it would help curb pollution."

More taxes from Chancellor Rishi Sunak... This doesn't affect (hurt) the online retailers at all. Both of these would just increase prices for the consumer who isn't going to change their habits.

No one in the Conservative Party seems to understand that there are solutions to this aside from adding new taxes or increasing existing taxes. You cannot simply point at something and say, "TAX THAT!".

Take this, for example:
"The Times reports the Treasury was concerned about how high street retailers had the burden of business rates for "high-value" properties that online variants didn't have to pay."

And who puts that burden on high street retailers? The government. They have the ability to wipe out business rates for high street retailers, but they won't. To level the playing field, you either wipe out business rates (not gonna happen because of the tax revenue), or you charge online-only retailers the same business rates (an increase in tax revenue).

If Amazon say they "pay all taxes they are legally obliged to pay in the UK", then increase those taxes. Tax the profits they make in this country, but don't raise the price of everything for the consumer.

(I am not a tax lawyer, and happily acknowledge I could be talking BS.)

Business rates are one of only a few ways for local government to collect any revenue, as they have been starved of income by the current Conservative national government.  Getting rid of business rates would cripple communities and local services, or would mean that council tax would have to rise, and any rise would hit poorer communities the hardest.

I think you're right that business rates for out of town warehouses for digital order distributers could be increased to level the playing field.  But many of them will operate out of tax exempt business parks that the government is very encouraging of (see also their proposals for free ports).

In short, the Conservative government is mismanaging the economy to an atrocious extent for their rich friends, and when they eventually get kicked out (however long that may take) they're going to leave the Treasury and the national fortune in a god awful mess.