William Gallagher
Facebook-owned WhatsApp has criticized Apple for demanding privacy information that it does not have to disclose for its own apps — but as it turns out, Apple is in fact disclosing this information, the same as it requires from third parties.
Alongside the continuing disagreements between Apple, Facebook and others over iOS 14 privacy features, WhatsApp has called the new feature unfair. The messaging company objects to how Apple's own Messages does not require the new privacy label details, because it is preinstalled on iPhones.
"While providing people with easy to read information is a good start," a WhatsApp spokesperson told Axios, " we believe it's important people can compare these 'privacy nutrition' labels from apps they download with apps that come pre-installed, like iMessage."
"We think labels should be consistent across first and third party apps," continued the spokesperson, "as well as reflect the strong measures apps may take to protect people's private information."
WhatsApp reports that it has submitted the information Apple requests about how its app handles user data. However, the company fears that users will see this specific information and learn none of its own security and privacy features.
"Our teams have submitted our privacy labels to Apple but Apple's template does not shed light on the lengths apps may go to protect sensitive information," said the spokesperson. "[For instance, while] WhatsApp cannot see people's messages or precise location, we're stuck using the same broad labels with apps that do."
Apple previously said that developers have to submit this "nutrition label" kind of information by December 8. It's now a requirement for all iOS 14 apps.
Additionally, Apple has told AppleInsider that all iOS apps are subject to the privacy information label, including its own. If an iOS app doesn't have its own product page, like some of the apps that ship with the iPhone, it will still have privacy data for users, published by Apple, on its website.
There is not yet, however, a date by which users will see such labels for all apps. Regardless of the December 8 deadline, Apple has said that existing apps will remain available to download even if the information is not supplied.
Consequently, users can expect to soon see some of these "nutrition labels" detailing privacy issues. However, it could be a considerable time before the information is on every relevant app.
Updated December 9 1:41 PM ET with information from Apple.
Christine McKee
AppleInsider Staff
Chip Loder
Malcolm Owen
33 Comments
Wah, wah, wah. Poor little Zuckerberg should stop whining and crying. Zero sympathy even when the twerp in chief has a point. All apps should follow the same disclosure rules. Not to worry the socialists in the EU will quickly pounce on this.
They should be careful what they wish for. Do they really want to invite that kind of comparison?
"Our teams have submitted our privacy labels to Apple but Apple's template does not shed light on the lengths apps may go to protect sensitive information,"
Do these guys listen to themselves talk? They make it sound like a bad thing.
Their response is 'whataboutism' and "but look at how we protect all that data which was taken through privacy violations"??
Whenever Zuckerberg complains about Apple crimping his style and affecting his bottom line I get a warm, fuzzy feeling all over. Feels good.
Apple’s built-in apps are already covered by the blanket privacy statements that are associated with the devices. Replicating this information on a per-app basis would be redundant. However, I don’t think that Apple repeating this information would be a burden on Apple or its customers. We all know what Apple is up to, no surprises there, but third parties, and especially the purveyors of so-called “free” apps, need to come clean and let their user base (the product) know how they are paying for “free.” This pushback from ZuckerBoy is a silly distraction but Apple can hammer their point home and swat this fly very easily by restating what is obvious to Apple customers. Then we’ll see what their next complaint will be, because they undoubtedly have a queue of them ready to go.