Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Kuo: Mini LED iPad Pro enters production in April, OLED iPad Air in 2022

Last updated

Noted Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo expects mass production of a rumored Mini LED iPad Pro to begin sometime in mid to late April, adding that the tech giant's tablet line will adopt OLED screen technology in 2022.

Kuo updated his Mini LED predictions in a note to investors on Thursday. In September, the analyst said iPad Pro would be the first of Apple's products to integrate the display technology with an expected launch date in the first half of 2021.

"According to our latest survey, the current production yield and quality have reached Apple's high standards, so it is expected that assemblers will start mass production of mini LED iPads after mid-to-late April," Kuo said in Thursday's note.

The revised timeline is in agreement with recent rumors regarding a near-future iPad Pro release. Echoing months-old predictions from Kuo, Bloomberg on Wednesday reported that the new tablets, including a 12.9-inch model with Mini LED screen, would be introduced as soon as April. DigiTimes sources cited a similar production schedule.

Looking ahead, Kuo sees potential integration of OLED screens in the iPad line in 2022, though Mini LED will remain an exclusive feature of Apple's high-end tablets. Interestingly, OLED is predicted to land in iPad Air first and might not make its way to the flagship iPad Pro.

"However, according to our latest industry survey, if the iPad adopts an OLED display in 2022, it will be the mid-/low-end iPad Air, while the high-end iPad Pro will still use a mini LED display," Kuo writes.

While OLED offers some advantages over Mini LED, the technology might not be an ideal candidate for productivity devices due to image retention and component lifecycle concerns. Apple is likely taking those points into consideration as it mulls an OLED future for iPad and Mac.

According to Kuo, Apple has sunk significant resources into Mini LED and will push the hardware as a key differentiator for its productivity device lineup. The specialized screens are expected to grace at least two MacBook Pro models in 2021, with MacBook Air benefitting from the technology in 2022.

Led by MacBook Pro and subsequent MacBook iterations, Apple's adoption of Mini LED will pick up steam over the next two years. Kuo forecasts display shipments to be 10 million in 2021 and between 20 million and 30 million in 2022.

Stay on top of the latest Apple news right from your HomePod. Say, "Hey, Siri, play AppleInsider," and you'll get latest AppleInsider Podcast. Or ask your HomePod mini for "AppleInsider Daily" instead and you'll hear a quick update direct from our news team. And, if you're interested in Apple-centric home automation, say "Hey, Siri, play HomeKit Insider," and you'll be listening to our newest specialized podcast in moments.



32 Comments

AppleZulu 2205 comments · 8 Years

Noted Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo expects...”

Seriously, are you contractually obligated to pump Kuo’s reputation when citing his reports? It’s just weird, especially when so many of his supposedly “highly accurate” predictions are revisions and corrections to his past (and now apparently not so highly accurate) prognostications. 

d_2 129 comments · 7 Years

Title says MB Air OLED - but the article contradicts and says Mini LED.

ElianGonzález 22 comments · 4 Years

AppleZulu said:
“Noted Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo expects...”

Seriously, are you contractually obligated to pump Kuo’s reputation when citing his reports? It’s just weird, especially when so many of his supposedly “highly accurate” predictions are revisions and corrections to his past (and now apparently not so highly accurate) prognostications. 

Making revisions about prior statements is something that analysts do when they get more information. They don't simply say "it is X" and walk away, never to return. 

And if one wants to bib-dribble about quoting the same person, that's more of an issue with this person named John Prosser, who is regularly quoted in multiple blog entries on this site. 

AppleZulu 2205 comments · 8 Years

AppleZulu said:
“Noted Apple analyst Ming-Chi Kuo expects...”

Seriously, are you contractually obligated to pump Kuo’s reputation when citing his reports? It’s just weird, especially when so many of his supposedly “highly accurate” predictions are revisions and corrections to his past (and now apparently not so highly accurate) prognostications. 
Making revisions about prior statements is something that analysts do when they get more information. They don't simply say "it is X" and walk away, never to return. 

And if one wants to bib-dribble about quoting the same person, that's more of an issue with this person named John Prosser, who is regularly quoted in multiple blog entries on this site. 

I have no problems with Kuo being a frequent source, nor do I have problems with Kuo revising his pronouncements. My question is about the laudatory descriptors of Kuo that are with great regularity included (on this and other sites) when reporting on his analyses. It’s quite oddly noticeable to the extent that it appears to be a very intentional effort to promote Kuo’s reputation. 


It’s a tried and true propaganda technique. If people read often enough that he’s a noted analyst who is reliable, highly accurate, and better than the other analysts, it starts to be taken as a given. Nobody bothers to look back and note how many things Kuo may have gotten wrong, much less how that compares to anyone else. 

I’ve even seen other commenters here preface criticisms of Kuo with acknowledgement of the apparently given fact that he’s highly accurate and better than average. It’s just weird. 

entropys 4316 comments · 13 Years

I’ve even seen other commenters here preface criticisms of Kuo with acknowledgement of the apparently given fact that he’s highly accurate and better than average. It’s just weird. 
Not a very high bar to leap over, it must be said. I understand your frustration, I guess initially he was better than the likes of Prosser, and people started labelling him as such, and it’s a habit. Same with that liveyourdream character, always gets an honorific too.

anyway, I believe there is some website that tracks reliability of these leaker/ rumour mongers, and Kuo is apparently OK!