Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Lossless streaming option for Apple Music may launch within weeks

Last updated

Apple is rumored to be preparing to reveal a high-fidelity feature for Apple Music within weeks, potentially alongside the launch of third-generation AirPods.

In February, Spotify joined Tidal in offering users lossless audio streams, with the launch of Spotify HiFi. While Apple doesn't currently provide lossless audio streaming options, it may do so soon if a rumor is to be believed.

A high-fidelity audio streaming service is said to be on the way, according to record label sources of Hits Daily Double. The option will apparently cost $9.99 per user, the same as its standard individual plan pricing.

The launch is also anticipated to occur at the same time as the introduction of third-generation AirPods. No exact details on launch timing were offered beyond "the coming weeks," nor further clarity on the supposed AirPods launch.

It is plausible that the "weeks" could result in a launch at WWDC 2021, which is set to take place from June 7. Though predominantly a software-centric event, Apple has been known to use it to make feature and hardware announcements.

Though Spotify launched its HiFi service, it has yet to actually roll it out to users. At the time, Spotify said it would be available in "select markets" later in 2021, but also declined to offer pricing.

Tidal currently offers its standard Premium account with 320Kbps audio at $9.99 per month, with Hi-Fi's lossless 1,411Kbps priced at $19.99 per month. Amazon Music's standard price is $9.99 per month, lowered to $7.99 for Prime users, while the HD service is an extra $5 per month.

If true, Apple's $9.99 extra fee for lossless would put it in the same ballpark as other existing Hi-Fi streaming offerings.

The possibility for a launch alongside new AirPods is plausible, as rumors of an update have floated for quite a few months. So far, the list of potential AirPods products includes the AirPods 3, the "AirPods X," the "AirPods Pro 2," and the "AirPods Pro Lite."

However, in March, prominent analyst Ming-Chi Kuo forecast that "AirPods 3" wouldn't come up until the fall of 2021, which was backed up by another report on March 26.

On April 28, it was claimed Apple was cutting its AirPods production by between 25% and 30%, on the back of supposed waning demand .



44 Comments

doal 4 Years · 28 comments

I’ve been waiting for this for a century

tmay 11 Years · 6456 comments

Interesting. 

I bought a Schiit Modi multibit DAC that is delayed a bit due to component shortages, that I can use to better connect a Mac to my stereo system via USB 3. I've also acquired a couple of mid 90's Sony Dolby S cassette decks off eBay, so that I can record off of Apple Music to create my own mix tapes, because I like the nostalgia of that.

Soon, there should be production of Type II cassettes in the U.S. using a new Cobalt formulation (that too has been delayed). 

https://www.nationalaudiocompany.com/product/preorder-clear-c256-tabs-in-audio-cassette-carton-of-100/

"We are excited to bring this new tape to you. It is tangible proof of our commitment to the cassette industry. Watch for our new C756™ Cobalt Type II tape coming in January, 2021." Now their stating May. 

I doubt that these are as high a quality as Maxell, et al, Type II cassettes from the 90's, but that's the best you will likely see of new production.

https://www.schiit.com/products/modi-1

InspiredCode 8 Years · 405 comments

The referenced article is not explicit about an extra fee. It says $9.99 tier, not a $19.98 tier. It also says it will be the same price as the standard plan. 

Additionally it says this “Speculation within the industry suggests Apple's move is to provide a more aggressively priced, higher-quality option after Spotify announced this week it was raising prices.” 

This suggests Apple plans to significantly undercut Spotify’s price. If this were an extra fee, it would not be undercutting Spotify.

Are we sure they are talking about it being an additional price in Apple’s case? 
Apple may just be absorbing any extra cost to increase subscribers and to bring more music fans in the Apple ecosystem. They could then use Apple Music to drive more users to other Apple services. Apple tends to not like to make extra money over specs that don’t require physical hardware changes, so if they were forced to do add a fee by the industry I would expect it to be a smaller increase like Amazon’s. If they don’t increase the price, it gives Apple bragging rights that their service is superior to others. 

Lossless was also something that deeply interested Steve Jobs, so I think Apple would want this to be for everyone simply in his honor.

EDIT: All the other Apple news sites seem to be interpreting this the same as me.

mike_galloway 4 Years · 115 comments

Streaming lossless puts a considerably higher load on the servers and to give lossless without a premium would result in a very high user uptake.

InspiredCode 8 Years · 405 comments

Streaming lossless puts a considerably higher load on the servers and to give lossless without a premium would result in a very high user uptake.

If they make it a standard tier feature, I wonder if it would have cellular limitations.