Emails and documents revealed in the Epic Games v. Apple case showcase the Cupertino tech giant's efforts to convince Netflix to keep using in-app payments on the App Store.
In 2018, Netflix killed off the ability for new subscribers to sign up for the service within its iOS app. Although Netflix didn't explain why, it was likely a way to avoid paying Apple's 30% commission on in-app purchases.
Once Apple learned of Netflix's plan to stop offering in-app subscriptions, it started an internal dialogue about the move and tried to get Netflix to reconsider, according to emails and documents first seen by 9to5Mac.
In 2018, for example, Netflix ran a trial to understand the value of removing in-app subscriptions in some markets.
Carson Oliver, Apple's Director of App Store Business Management, wrote at the time that Apple "expressed our concern that running the test would create a bad customer experience for app users in those markets and limit co-marketing opportunities."
Oliver also made reference to a "churn issue" among subscribers on iOS. In other words, more users who signed up for Netflix on iPhone or iPad stopped subscribing than users who subscribed elsewhere.
Additionally, Oliver also asked other participants in the email chain if Apple should take "punitive measures" in response to the trial. He also questioned how those measures could be communicated to Netflix.
Other emails in the thread indicate that Apple executives held a variety of meetings with Netflix to discuss the test. Some of the meetings included discussions about coming to a "middle-ground solution" for the Apple TV — a solution that apparently was never found.
One of Apple's attempts to convince Netflix to stick with IAP included a detailed presentation that justified the App Store commission and offered a variety of supposed benefits to keeping in-app subscriptions. In the presentation, Apple attempted to woo Netflix by highlighting the various ways it had driven subscribers to the service or featured Netflix in App Store editorial content.
Additionally, the presentation offered a variety of solutions that Apple and Netflix could work on together, including an Apple TV bundle, in-depth performance data, and an option to join a "video partner program." Other ideas included in the slide deck revolve around deeper partnerships, including marketing Netflix at Apple retail locations or sending out email campaigns promoting the streaming service.
Apple's attempts to convince Netflix ultimately proved fruitless. However, just a year later, the Cupertino tech giant launched its Apple TV+ service, bringing the company into direct competition with Netflix.
Stay on top of all Apple news right from your HomePod. Say, "Hey, Siri, play AppleInsider," and you'll get latest AppleInsider Podcast. Or ask your HomePod mini for "AppleInsider Daily" instead and you'll hear a fast update direct from our news team. And, if you're interested in Apple-centric home automation, say "Hey, Siri, play HomeKit Insider," and you'll be listening to our newest specialized podcast in moments.
11 Comments
What this says to me is Apple really never wanted to do video. They preferred to maintain their hardware and platform but it was becoming increasingly clear they were at the mercy of a 3rd party once again that could and eventually would leave their customers without a solution unless they were competing in the market themselves. Well, if Apple is making money there the others are more likely to stay.
None of this benefits Epic's cause. Apple has and continues to be a business looking for more business any way they can.
Yeah, because what I (and every other Apple customer) want are more hackable websites to drop our credit card details into.
What is relevant here is that Netflix and Apple discussed the situation. Apple didn’t make a special deal for Netflix and Netflix didn’t violate their agreement with Apple. Netflix took the payments out of the iPhone app to legit avoid the commission and Netflix accepted the downsides to that.