Apple's generative AI efforts could add more AI to iOS in 2024

Apple has embarked on a billion-dollar push to develop generative AI, as the iPhone maker attempts to bring more AI to the next versions of its operating systems.

Following a wave of technological progress pushed forward by ChatGPT and its rivals, Apple needs to be seen to catch up with the rest of the market. Apple CEO Tim Cook confirmed in September that the company is "of course" working on generative AI, but not what was on the way.

In Sunday's "Power On" newsletter for Bloomberg, Apple executives were "caught off guard" by the influx of AI, and has been working to make up for lost time since late 2022.

"There's a lot of anxiety about this and it's considered a pretty big miss internally," a source told the report.

Along with creating an internal chatbot called "Apple GPT," the company is keen to work out how to add the technology to its products.

The AI push is headed up by SVPs John Giannandrea and Craig Federighi, in charge of AI and software respectively. Services chief Eddy Cue is also apparently on board with the project, which is set to cost Apple about $1 billion per year.

Giannandrea is managing the development of a new AI system's technology, as well as revamping Siri to use the system. It is thought that a new and improved Siri using the technology could arrive as soon as 2024.

The software engineering group controlled by Federighi will be working to add AI to the next edition of iOS. This will apparently involve features that use Apple's large language model, and could improve how Siri fields questions and how Messages auto-completes sentences.

There is also exploration in adding generative AI to development tools such as Xcode. Doing so could help developers create apps for Apple's platforms more quickly.

Services will also work to add AI wherever it can in its various apps, such as auto-generated Apple Music playlists. This could also include helping users write in Pages or create slides in Keynote.

Apple is also trialling using generative AI for internal customer service apps under AppleCare.

As development continues, there is apparently some debate over whether to continue pushing for on-device processing or if using cloud-based LLMs could help. The former is more privacy-focused, but the latter could allow for more advanced features to be developed.

Latest Exclusives

Latest comparisons

14 Comments

foregoneconclusion 2857 comments · 12 Years

About 1 year ago

AI stands for "Appearance of Intelligence". There's no actual intelligence involved at all. It only appears that way if you don't see what's happening behind the curtain.

Xed 2896 comments · 4 Years

foregoneconclusion said:

AI stands for "Appearance of Intelligence". There's no actual intelligence involved at all. It only appears that way if you don't see what's happening behind the curtain.

1) No, it stands for artificial intelligence. This is common knowledge.

2) Intelligence is defined as "the ability to acquire and apply knowledge and skills." Now explain to us how you define so-called "actual intelligence".

danox 3442 comments · 11 Years

Google artificial intelligence designed and released a new phone the Pixel 8 Pro that has a very slow Tensor processor that is five years behind Apple, and one year behind Samsung, the Pixel 8 Pro which is also equipped with extremely bad modem that is supposed to send this information (video boost) back to Google headquarters to process and then send back to the Pixel 8 Pro smartphone, yep that’s AI at its finest, and Apple is supposedly behind? Hmm…. I think Apple is ahead in the usable software/hardware department with a product that you can actually use. Tim Cook and the boys/girls at Apple are just politely biding their time and grinning at their competition running around like a chickens without an AI head, kinda like this Apple guy was doing in 2007.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7qPAY9JqE4

danox said:

Google artificial intelligence designed and released a new phone the Pixel 8 Pro that has a very slow Tensor processor that is five years behind Apple, and one year behind Samsung, the Pixel 8 Pro which is also equipped with extremely bad modem that is supposed to send information (video boost) back to Google headquarters to process and then send back to the Pixel 8 Pro smartphone, yep that’s AI at its finest, and Apple is supposedly behind? Hmm…. I think Apple is ahead in the usable software/hardware department with a product that you can actually use. Tim Cook and the boys/girls at Apple are just politely biding their time and grinning at their competition running around like a chickens without an AI head, kinda like this Apple guy was doing in 2007.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7qPAY9JqE4

I'm with you. I don't think Apple has been resting on their laurels as AI development has grown over the last 70 years. To me this is like people bellyaching over any time Apple doesn't offer a "me first" or "me too" product when the media latches onto a new market frenzy, and despite Apple proving time and time again how to do business with fewer gaffes than successes, we still have people on this forum that will tell you that Apple should've released a Netbook.

Xed said:

danox said:

Google artificial intelligence designed and released a new phone the Pixel 8 Pro that has a very slow Tensor processor that is five years behind Apple, and one year behind Samsung, the Pixel 8 Pro which is also equipped with extremely bad modem that is supposed to send information (video boost) back to Google headquarters to process and then send back to the Pixel 8 Pro smartphone, yep that’s AI at its finest, and Apple is supposedly behind? Hmm…. I think Apple is ahead in the usable software/hardware department with a product that you can actually use. Tim Cook and the boys/girls at Apple are just politely biding their time and grinning at their competition running around like a chickens without an AI head, kinda like this Apple guy was doing in 2007.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7qPAY9JqE4

I'm with you. I don't think Apple has been resting on their laurels as AI development has grown over the last 70 years. To me this is like people bellyaching over any time Apple doesn't offer a "me first" or "me too" product when the media latches onto a new market frenzy, and despite Apple proving time and time again how to do business with fewer gaffes than successes, we still have people on this forum that will tell you that Apple should've released a Netbook.

Something similar is happening in the chip design world, because Apple has a large presence in the mobile area. Their chip design department is trying to design products with very high performance, but at the same time Apple has a design goal of keeping the wattage within a sane level. Apple’s path appears to be different than Intel, Nvidia, and AMD, who don’t seem to share that goal particularly Nvidia, Apple has added ray tracing cores, to the A17 SOC, Which means the M3 will also get ray tracing cores also, but Apples approach seems to be more measured. I don’t think they’re aiming for 450W or 650W desktop systems.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5dhuxRF2c_w Take a look at the coolant cooling system required for using the 4090 card I don’t think Apple is looking to go down that
path, a path that they briefly were on with IBM which didn’t work out too well?