The Wall Street Journal claimed on Monday that the DoJ has warned Apple and the publishers of its plans to sue them.
One of the issues under investigation is Apple's alleged role in convincing e-book publishers to switch to an agency model from the wholesale model that Amazon had implemented with its Kindle store. Under the old system, publishers would sell their books at wholesale and let the bookseller set its own prices. Amazon had consistently upset publishers by selling titles at a loss.
As Apple readied its iBooks digital bookstore ahead of the release of the original iPad in early 2010, Apple CEO Steve Jobs offered to implement the agency model for its store. The company agreed to let publishers set prices in exchange for a 30 percent cut and an agreement that prevented other retailers from undercutting them. The publishers then used their deal with Apple as leverage to pressure Amazon to switch to the agency model.
Simon & Schuster, Hachette, Penguin, Macmillan and HarperCollins are the publishers that could face legal action from the federal agency. Random House, the only other Big Six publisher, is not included in the investigation because it initially rejected the agency model.
Insiders claimed that the Justice Department suspects Apple and the publishers of violating federal antitrust laws by colluding to raise prices. For their part, the publishers argue that they were trying to enhance competition with the shift to agency pricing. Some of the publishers are also being investigated over agreements to delay e-book releases to allow hardcover editions a window of exclusivity.
People familiar with the matter told the Journal that several of the parties involved in the probe have entered talks to settle the case in an effort to avoid going to court. However, sources said only some of the publishers are in settlement discussions.
One publishing executive told the publication that negotiations with the DoJ have "taken many turns." Another executive said that a settlement was still a ways off.
The Justice Department lawsuit would come on the heels of a class-action lawsuit filed last year. A group of consumers have accused Apple and the publishers of engaging in an e-book "price-fixing conspiracy" that resulted in price hikes. The complaint draws upon comments made by Jobs to his biographer about the move to the agency model for iBooks as evidence of the alleged collusion.
The European Commission began investigating Apple and the publishers late last year. Apple also faced an anticompetitive inquiry from the Connecticut Attorney General in 2010.
Apple redoubled its e-book efforts in January with the release of iBooks 2. The company is looking to tap the education market by providing low-cost interactive digital textbooks as alternatives to traditional textbooks. The iPad maker also released iBooks Author, a free tool for creating e-books for the iBookstore,.
98 Comments
With the good comes the bad.
So an agency model is illegal? Apple taking 30% instead of Amazon taking 70% is illegal? Am I missing something here because it sounds like Amazon was the one trying to shut out any competition and controlling both customers and publishers?
So an agency model is illegal? Apple taking 30% instead of Amazon taking 70% is illegal? Am I missing something here because it sounds like Amazon was the one trying to shut out any competition and controlling both customers and publishers?
I agree both companies are trying to shut out competition. But the end results are different. Amazon's way can drive away competition, but at the same time also sell books at lower prices than what publishers want, while Apple's way can drive away competition and sell books at higher price than customers want.
Anti Trust. Seems like I heard this before. Microsoft and anti Trust. Whats next Anti Trust over Apple selling iPads below their actual value? This is pathetic. You gotta wonder if Amazon and others are trying to pay off officials to disrupt Apple and its business. Wonder if Apple will secretly pay off the same officials or some other big wigs who can change the out come of this.
The bottom line is that people will be more inclined to buy books from amazon than directly from the publisher if Amazon can set the prices at whatever they want to. How is that not the height of anti competitive? Apple allowing book publishers to set their own prices for their own material is now collusion.
Case is a waste of resources.