Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Adobe Lightroom users on iOS and iPadOS reporting missing photos, presets

Adobe's recent Lightroom mobile update had an unfortunate consequence — it deleted some users' entire library of photos, edits, and presets.

Adobe customers are now reporting that updating to Lightroom 5.4.0 on the iPhone and iPad wipes all photos and presets that were not synced to the Lightroom cloud storage service. There's no word on how many people were affected by the bug.

The problem primarily affects those who did not pay for an Adobe subscription, as their work was not automatically backed up to Adobe's cloud storage. A post on the Photoshop support forums states that there is no way to recover the photos or presets if a user has already updated to Lightroom 5.4.0.

Understandably, users weren't happy. Some took to Twitter to air out their grievances, with one user noting that she'd lost over 800 images and hundreds of dollars worth of presets.

One Reddit user, as pointed out by PetaPixel, said that after four hours of talking to Adobe, they were told that there would be no fix.

The situation serves as an important reminder to always back up your work to your cloud service of choice, such as Apple's iCloud.

Adobe has since released a new version of Lightroom mobile, version 5.4.1, which does not wipe photos or presets. It also does not restore any lost data.

12 Comments

sflocal 17 Years · 6164 comments

Inexcusable.  

As a Lightroom Classic user, it's crap like this which is why I refuse to use Lightroom where one keeps their photos under the Adobe clould umbrella.  I am beholden to a company to make sure they don't ruin my photos.

I keep my photos on-site on my own server, with my own backup facility. 

3 Likes · 0 Dislikes
gatorguy 14 Years · 24713 comments

sflocal said:
Inexcusable.  
As a Lightroom Classic user, it's crap like this which is why I refuse to use Lightroom where one keeps their photos under the Adobe clould umbrella.  I am beholden to a company to make sure they don't ruin my photos.

I keep my photos on-site on my own server, with my own backup facility. 

Likewise, though I do keep a copy of all 3-5 star images backed up to Google Cloud as well and a copy of final print-ready images on Google Photos (as much for sharing as anything else). I have had drives fail before tho very rare over the past 20 years

skippingrock 20 Years · 203 comments

Backup of backup of backup. 

Trusting a single source for your backups, even your own drives is a recipe for disaster. 
Trust me I know. 

caladanian 11 Years · 380 comments

5.4.1 “resolved a bug in which some customers may have lost access to their photos” - spinning this major mistake into something neglectable will make the affected likely even more furious. 

sflocal 17 Years · 6164 comments

gatorguy said:
sflocal said:
Inexcusable.  
As a Lightroom Classic user, it's crap like this which is why I refuse to use Lightroom where one keeps their photos under the Adobe clould umbrella.  I am beholden to a company to make sure they don't ruin my photos.

I keep my photos on-site on my own server, with my own backup facility. 
Likewise, though I do keep a copy of all 3-5 star images backed up to Google Cloud as well and a copy of final print-ready images on Google Photos (as much for sharing as anything else). I have had drives fail before tho very rare over the past 20 years

All my photos reside on an 8-drive RAID array, and archived in Dropbox which has an excellent disaster-recovery features if I ever need to restore data.  So an on-site redundant option, and an offsite, redundant option for the worst-case, house-burns-down scenario.


Anyone not having a backup solution is just asking for trouble.  First Canon, now Adobe?  Who's next?