Neil HughesBut Denny Strigl, Verizon's president, said that the mere presence of the iPhone in the market has had a ripple effect on competing devices, which, in turn, has been a benefit for Verizon Wireless.
Verizon has many smartphones that compete with the iPhone. The company intends to launch another iPhone competitor in the Palm Pre, after Palm's exclusive agreement ends with Sprint next year. The largest cell phone carrier in the U.S. also has a new BlackBerry Storm and Google Android phones on the way.
But all of those products are driven by the innovation brought by Apple and the iPhone, Strigl said.
"When you think about what Apple has done in bringing the iPhone into the marketplace," he said during the Q2 2009 conference call, "it truly has accelerated innovation. And as we talk to all of our manufacturers, everybody has come out with their own iconic device, and I think that this has been very good overall for our customers."
Verizon also expects to launch its own application store this year, to compete with Apple's App Store. Company officials have said they will require their store to be installed on new smartphones sold through the company.
Most of Verizon's second-quarter troubles came from its sagging landline business. Total profit was $3.16 billion, down from $3.4 billion a year ago.
Verizon recently bowed to the U.S. government and agreed that it would unlock some exclusive phones for use on smaller wireless carriers. This as members of the U.S. Congress are looking into exclusive cell phone arrangements such as the one between AT&T and Apple for the iPhone.
Last week, Verizon said it added 1.1 million wireless subscribers during the quarter. That lagged behind competitor AT&T, which netted 1.4 million new subscribers — most of them choosing the iPhone.
Rumors have surfaced that Verizon is secretly prepping its high-speed Long Term Evolution 4G data network for launch in early 2010. This as AT&T chief executive Randall Stephenson is reportedly working behind the scenes to extend his company's exclusive iPhone contract with Apple.
Oliver Haslam
William Gallagher
Christine McKee
Sponsored Content
Malcolm Owen
Andrew Orr
105 Comments
Remember back in 2005 when the CEO of Intel complemented Apple on their Macs and advised new computer buyer to choose Macs just weeks before the announcement that Apple was moving from PowerPC to Intel?
Perhaps this is yet another such indication. It wouldn't surprise me if Apple makes some kind of deal with Verizon after the AT&T deal expires and LTE is up and running. Granted, Apple would need to get some kind of exception to Verizon's "use our app store by default" policy.
Ah, it's amazing and gratifying to see how their tune has changed a couple of years later - all these big boys (both the carriers and the handset makers) were, by-and-large, smirking at the iPhone in January 2007.
SJ wholeheartedly deserves his last laugh on this.
All commentary about technology aside (realistic LTE rollout speed, multiple iPhone architecture setups, etc), I simply can't understand how Apple would want to extend their contract with AT&T. Obviously, opening the doors would extend their financial opportunities - that's not even worth debating. But after WWDC, when several of the important new features of the 3GS had to be announced as not available at launch for the country in which the parent company is located... Just on embarrassment alone, that's a relationship-ender.
I can't imagine AT&T could offer enough money to offset those two points.
But maybe I'm just a wishful sot, longing for a Verizon iPhone...
Um, hello! Verizon! It's not a good sign that your manufacturers needed to see the iPhone in order to "innovate". Copy is a better word.
All commentary about technology aside (realistic LTE rollout speed, multiple iPhone architecture setups, etc), I simply can't understand how Apple would want to extend their contract with AT&T. Obviously, opening the doors would extend their financial opportunities - that's not even worth debating. But after WWDC, when several of the important new features of the 3GS had to be announced as not available at launch for the country in which the parent company is located... Just on embarrassment alone, that's a relationship-ender.
I can't imagine AT&T could offer enough money to offset those two points.
But maybe I'm just a wishful sot, longing for a Verizon iPhone...
Verizon pulls a lot of crap too. Disabling features of phones like bluetooth etc, very well documented.