Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Media request to unseal docs in Gizmodo iPhone case rejected

A request filed by the Associated Press and other media organization to obtain the sealed affidavit used to obtain the search warrant for the raid on Gizmodo blogger Jason Chen's home has been denied.

Judge Stephen Hall of San Mateo County refused to consider the request, instead deferring the case to the judge who granted the search warrant, who will hear arguments on the matter next week, according to a report filed by CNET.

The request was opposed by the District Attorney's office, which argued in a legal brief that prosecutors needed to "maintain the security of an ongoing investigation, which may well be compromised by the disclosure of the search warrant affidavit."

At issue in the affidavit are the names of "two individuals of interest, whom police do not want to alert," the report said, citing comments from an attorney for the media coalition filling the brief who spoke with chief deputy district attorney Stephen Wagstaffe.

Wagstaffe said the affidavit is "not a public record and thus is not subject to requests under any public-records act" and defended the decision to search Chen's home, saying, "our belief is that it's a proper search."

The EFF and other media groups have criticized the search as being improper because Chen's home office could be considered a newsroom, and therefore protected under shield laws designed to prevent police from investigating journalists' sources.

However, prosecutors say the search was related to a felony theft investigation rather than simply being an effort to determine Chen's sources as a journalist.



119 Comments

ihxo 23 Years · 566 comments

It's an on going investigation.
What makes them think that they have the rights to get their hands on those documents.

mdriftmeyer 20 Years · 7395 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by ihxo

It's an on going investigation.
What makes them think that they have the rights to get their hands on those documents.

I presume their attorneys told them they had no shot, but they did it to score some pr points in hopes of deflecting blame on them.

zeromeus 15 Years · 182 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by ihxo

It's an on going investigation.
What makes them think that they have the rights to get their hands on those documents.

because they are 88s... read it aloud...

nasserae 16 Years · 3166 comments

Quote:
However, prosecutors say the search was related to a felony theft investigation rather than simply being an effort to determine Chen's sources as a journalist.

Like many expected.