AppleInsider Staff
After threatening to pursue legal action against AltConf over plans to stream WWDC content at an unaffiliated conference, Apple on Friday agreed to grant limited access to keynote and Platforms State of the Union presentations.
According to AltConf, an outpouring of "support and passion" from the developer community over the past day has given Apple cause to reconsider a Wednesday decision that barred streaming access to the Worldwide Developers Conference.
As of today, the WWDC keynote and Platforms State of the Union sessions will both be aired live on Monday at AltConf's viewing room. Under terms agreed upon by both parties, all other WWDC sessions will not be made available for screening.
For the past few years, AltConf has held free WWDC viewing events for attendees alongside its own offering of speakers, developer videos, guest panels and more. Like WWDC, the conference is held in San Francisco and takes place during the same five-day span.
AltConf introduced a paid "Hero Supporter" ticket tier for 2015, causing confusion as to whether organizers were attempting to profit off WWDC's live stream.
AltConf was never charging for access to any Apple content, and this has been clear in our communications with Apple over the past weeks. AltConf is a community driven event and Paid Hero tickets were never meant as a ticket to cover the cost of the stream but to allow the community to show their support and offset the costs of renting the theatre.
Conference organizers note paid tickets only guarantee access to two speaking theaters under certain conditions, not areas showing streaming content.
Apple is offering its own keynote stream to Apple TV owners, iOS device users and through the Web, while developers can access live lab sessions by visiting Apple's Developer website. AppleInsider will offer live coverage of the event as it unfolds next week.
Sponsored Content
Charles Martin
Christine McKee
Malcolm Owen
Amber Neely
11 Comments
Damn it. Now we're going to have to find something else to hate Apple over¡
Clearly AltConf was able to convince Apple to their satisfaction that the AltConf organizers were not profiting off the Apple streams. Good decision Apple. Case closed.
[quote name="Felix01" url="/t/186602/apple-to-allow-limited-wwdc-streaming-at-altconf#post_2731595"]Clearly AltConf was able to convince Apple to their satisfaction that the AltConf organizers were not profiting off the Apple streams. Good decision Apple. Case closed.[/quote] But ... but ... but, whiners gotta whine, haters gotta hate ... what will they do, where will they go, how will they live their empty lives??
Damn it. Now we're going to have to find something else to hate Apple over¡
Do you mean something like....
[quote name="leavingthebigG" url="/t/186602/apple-to-allow-limited-wwdc-streaming-at-altconf#post_2731600"] Do you mean something like.... [LIST=1] [*] Twitter lying about its decrease in subscriber numbers against the increase in Instagram subscriber numbers due to an iOS change? why didn't Instagram have the exact problem? Maybe, just maybe, because Instagram prepared for the change while Twitter did not. [*] Pebble not owning its decision to reject its approved app and submitting an updated app to Apple FIVE days before shipping a watch that depended on the app then blaming Apple for customers not being able to use their watches because the newly submitted app had not been approved in time? [*] Spotify not wanting to pay Apple for reaching Apple customers while having Apple pay to host a Spotify competitive app, accept credit card payments, handle refunds, have 24x7 worldwide access to the Spotify app on the Apple owned and operated App Store? [*] Not allowing Real Networks to break FairPlay DRM so it could compete with Apple while Apple was under contract with record labels to provide a bullet-proof DRM to prevent piracy of music? [*] Apple not providing a Google Photos competitor that would stop people from willingly uploading all of their pictures to Google's servers permanently for wholesale slicing and dicing for resale to Google partners for advertising revenue while being protected from being shared with Joe Smith across the pond. [*] The FBI saying Apple data encryption will prevent it from possibly stopping the death of a child. [*] Apple buying a fingerprint sensor company that somehow two years after the fact prevent Google from providing a fingerprint sensor on its smartphones and tablets? [*] Google being kicked out of iOS because it would not update Google Maps unless Apple provided a trove of customer data AND providing more branding of Google Maps in iOS even though Apple was the reason Google Maps became popular? [*] Samsung not being allowed to slavishly copy Apple hardware and software designs? Oh wait... The US Federal court system thinks that is okay for Samsung to have done that. [*] Samsung losing its inflated number one positions in China and India to more nimble competitors? [/LIST] [/quote] Well put.