Apple announced Siri alongside the iPhone 4S, billing it as one of the most exciting features for the new handset. The Cupertino, Calif., company built the virtual personal assistant feature into its new phone after purchasing Siri for $200 million last year.
According to a recent report, the Siri team at Apple is one of the largest software teams at the company. Siri's unique personality and sense of humor has even inspired the creation of numerous websites and blogs detailing its creative responses.
Though initial reviewers have called Siri the "standout feature" of the iPhone 4S, Rubin and Lees don't appear to view it as much of a threat, based on comments they recently made at AllThingsD's AsiaD conference in Hong Kong.
Rubin, who currently serves as Google's senior vice president of mobile, said in an interview on Wednesday that he doesn't "believe that your phone should be an assistant.â
âYour phone is a tool for communicating. You shouldnât be communicating with the phone; you should be communicating with somebody on the other side of the phone,â he added.
According to the executive, who is a former Apple employee, it still remains to be seen whether customers will take to talking to a phone and not another person. âWeâll see how pervasive it gets,â said Rubin. He did point out, however, that one of the co-founder of Android had worked on a cellphone speech company. Google itself has already built a measure of voice recognition functionality into Android, though the technology is not as advanced as Siri.
âThis isnât a new notion,â he said. âIn projecting the future, I think Apple did a good job of figuring out when the technology was ready to be consumer-grade.â
On Thursday, Microsoft's Lees said that he didn't think Siri was "super useful," as reported by Engadget. He also touted Windows Phone 7's own voice recognition implementation as harnessing "the full power of the internet, rather than a certain subset," because it uses Bing for its voice search feature.
It's unclear what exactly Lees meant by the comment, however, as Siri allows users to run searches on Google, Bing and Yahoo, in addition to providing access to a set of services, including Wolfram Alpha, Wikipedia and Yelp.
According to the report, Lees implied that Microsoft would avoid having its users speak commands to their phones in public.
While Apple's competitors may doubt Siri's usefulness, millions of customers have already voted with their wallets. During launch weekend, Apple sold a record 4 million iPhone 4S units. Company executives have said they are confident that the new device will set an all-time high for iPhone sales in the current quarter, which ends in December.
223 Comments
And in a few months they will bring their own Siri-like assistant. What a bunch of tools.
Rubin doesn't sound like he's dissing it, just offering his opinion...he may be wrong, sure, but he isn't offensive or even dismissive.
Lees on the other hand?
And in a few months they will bring their own Siri-like assistant. What a bunch of tools.
They both already have Siri-like features...Siri is an advancement of that tech...likely Google will add open API's or something to allow for the inputting of calendar events etc, but I doubt it'd be as fun as Siri is. Maybe not even as natural.
something like "Mark event, Friday at 12pm, Lunch with Deborah."
I agree with most of it I suppose. Apple's purchase of Siri was a great decision. Especially the deep integration it has. I however would not use this in public, and would probably laugh / shake my head at anyone who does when I finally see it happen.
I would however use it to send a text to someone while driving.
A lot of these features have been available on Android for quite a while. As in, with a single button press, I can tell my phone to call anyone, to send a text message, or to start voice navigation.
Everything else that Siri has is usually just a glorified Google search.
I'm sorry, but this is one of the stupidest statements I've ever read. That's quite some spin. Really? So these new fangled phones are only for calling people now? We 'communicate' with the phone every time we use it. If we can get a variety of tasks done faster by voice than by touch, that's not a good thing? I know he doesn't really believe in his comment and it's just PR, but thats what I can't stand. Google has always been big on voice. He's saying bullshit for the sake of saying bullshit, which makes it very difficult to respect anything else he has to say.