Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Bill Gates cautions Apple and other tech companies about arrogance inviting government interference

Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates has warned Apple and other tech companies that they need to exercise care when dealing with governments over important issues, such as the San Bernardino fight between Apple and the FBI over a locked iPhone, suggesting the firms may be inviting government intervention for overtly arrogant actions.

In an interview with Axios ahead of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's annual letter release, Gates noted the policies and activities of major tech firms are working against some important areas of the government's work. "The companies need to be careful that they're not... advocating things that would prevent government from being able to, under appropriate review, perform the type of functions that we've come to count on," advises Gates.

When asked if he has seen situations where this has occurred, Gates confirms "Oh, absolutely."

According to Gates, the tech companies have to be "careful that they're not trying to think their view is more important than the government's view, or than the government being able to function in some key areas." When asked for examples, he highlighted the "enthusiasm about making financial transactions anonymous and invisible, and their view that even a clear mass-murdering criminal's communication should never be available to the government."

While it is not mentioned specifically, it is likely that this refers to the ever-ongoing encryption debate between tech companies and government agencies, including the FBI. While the security agencies want to have access to data encrypted on smartphones, such as by the introduction of backdoors, Apple and other companies counter with claims that this would weaken security overall, increasing the chances of a data breach by a hacker or other bad actors.

Part of the debate was fueled by the 2016 San Bernardino shootings, where the FBI went to court to compel Apple into breaking into an iPhone 5c owned by one of the shooters to search for evidence. The Department of Justice withdrew the legal action after the FBI managed to gain access to the device, allegedly by paying Israel-based security firm Cellebrite to bypass Apple's device protection.

An open letter from Apple CEO Tim Cook published to the Apple website in February 2016 explained Apple's stance on encryption, due to it having "implications far beyond the legal case at hand." Cook warns that, while Apple could potentially have created a version of iOS to bypass the security, it was impossible to guarantee that it wouldn't be misused in the future, despite government insistence that it would only be used for that specific investigation.

On being asked if his example referred to Apple unlocking an iPhone for a government, Gates avoided confirming outright, but offered in reply "There's no question of ability; it's the question of willingness."

At the time of the San Bernardino dispute, Gates had to clarify reports suggesting he sided with the FBI, advising of a more balanced stance on the issue.

In the clarification, he suggested there could be a series of "safeguards" that could be implemented, preventing investigators from being "completely blind" in cases where such information would be warranted. He also acknowledged that the U.S. government has "taken information historically" and used it in unexpected ways, in activities going as far back as the FBI under J. Edgar Hoover's tenure.

As part of the same interview, Bill Gates also mused on how the progress of technology is empowering smaller groups of people to cause harm to others. Suggesting the potential for such groups to gain access to nuclear weapons and to cause biological terror and cyber attacks, Gates notes it is a good thing for children to access genetic technology in a laboratory, "unless a few people decide to make human-transmissible smallpox and spread that into the world."



42 Comments

eightzero 14 Years · 3148 comments

If/when the government gets sufficiently fed up, it may simply take the iOS source code and pay "just compensation." Done.

lkrupp 19 Years · 10521 comments

I agree with Mr. Gates. The strident caterwauling about privacy and government snooping by anonymous commenters on websites like this one is hilarious. If the FBI showed up at your doorstep you’d piss your pants and cry like a baby. You most certainly would not meet them at the door with your gun. If you pull on the dragon’s tail once to often you’re going to get burned. It is entirely possible that democratic governments will legislate access to encrypted data at some point. Better to be calm and quiet about it while demanding your privacy than to start a confrontation. Face it, people no longer control their governments, democratic or otherwise.

tmay 11 Years · 6456 comments

eightzero said:
If/when the government gets sufficiently fed up, it may simply take the iOS source code and pay "just compensation." Done.

On privacy and security, Bill is past his shelf life. Stick with charitable causes.

jdb8167 16 Years · 626 comments

The US government couldn’t protect its security clearance database but we are supposed to believe that they can be trusted with encryption back doors?

SpamSandwich 19 Years · 32917 comments

What happens when the “clear mass-murdering criminal(s)” are the government?

No, there are things that are best left up wholly to the individual. Bill is disappointing.