Intellectual property expert Florian Mueller of FOSS Patents described the deal as a "significant development" in his analysis published on Tuesday. The deal means that Motorola Mobility, which is owned by Google, will now need to rely on non-standard essential patents in its ongoing patent infringement litigation against Apple.
"With such standard-essential patents, it appears that the only thing Google (Motorola) can do now against Apple in Germany is to push for as high a royalty rate as possible, but even in a hypothetical worst-case scenario to Apple, the limit will be the 2.25% rate that Motorola has been demanding for a long time," Mueller wrote.
The agreement between Apple and Motorola was revealed in a court filing made this week in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of California. Though the patent licensing deal came to light this week, it's unknown exactly when the deal was first reached.
"Most likely, this Motorola-Apple license agreement at a FRAND rate left to be determined by the courts was concluded during this month of August," Mueller said.
The details were disclosed only days after the U.S. International Trade Commission completed its review of a Motorola patent infringement complaint against Apple. The ITC ruled against an import ban on Apple's iPhone and iPad, as the commission determined that the devices do not infringe on certain wireless technology patents owned by Motorola Mobility.
Both Apple and Motorola have had some success against one another in patent infringement lawsuits filed in Germany. Late last year, Motorola won a temporary injunction against the iPhone and iPad over 3G patents in Germany, while Apple also earned an injunction against Motorola for violating its slide-to-unlock patent.
24 Comments
You shouldn't be able to patent essential stuff anyway. It's really not fair.
Is this Motorola or Motorola Mobility in Germany that inked a deal? I assume the former. I am confused as I had thought all the patents in question were now part of Google's war chest.
This a good step, Google is one of my favorite companies along with Apple. No matter how nasty things get I don't want FRAND patents being used. It would be great if Apple and Google would get together and take FRAND patents off the table completely.
Yes ridiculous pinch to zoom and overly broad patents like slide to unlock are still a pain in the bottom, but taking FRAND off the table is an important first step.
[quote name="Techstalker" url="/t/152186/apple-reaches-patent-licensing-deal-with-motorola-in-germany#post_2177739"]This a good step, Google is one of my favorite companies along with Apple. No matter how nasty things get I don't want FRAND patents being used. It would be great if Apple and Google would get together and take FRAND patents off the table completely. Yes ridiculous pinch to zoom and overly broad patents like slide to unlock are still a pain in the bottom, but taking FRAND off the table is an important first step. [/quote] Yes, but this agreement is largely window-dressing. Apple knew that they were going to have to license FRAND/SEP patents, but couldn't reach an agreement on the price. Today's news simply says that they've put that in writing: "we'll license the patents, but don't agree with the price that Motorola is asking so we want the court to determine the price". Nothing new here.
This a good step, Google is one of my favorite companies along with Apple.
The two are barely comparable. One cares about the User Experience, the other is a bottom-feeding ad-firm.
You're free to like what you like, but I've seen some strange tastes . . .