Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

OtterBox secures $2M court victory over counterfeiters

Popular Apple device accessory maker OtterBox has won the latest in a series of legal actions against counterfeiters, securing a $2 million verdict against a New York-based company.

A U.S. District Court judge issued a permanent injunction recently against S & P Trading Inc., saying that the firm had violated provisions of the Lanham Act in purchasing and selling at least 146,025 counterfeit cases. Those cases, the judge decided, infringed on OtterBox's federally registered trademarks.

OtterBox has more than 110 trademark registrations worldwide, with a number of others pending. OtterBox also holds more than 190 patents in the United States.

This latest decision is but one in a series of actions OtterBox has taken against counterfeiters. In 2012, OtterBox collaborated with U.S. Customs and Border Protection to seize 118,000 counterfeit items. That action resulted in additional judgments of nearly $11 million.

OtterBox's CEO praised the effect the recent decision would have on consumer protection.

“OtterBox was built on bringing our customers innovative, first-to-market products,” said OtterBox CEO Brian Thomas. “A lot of design, engineering and testing goes into each of our custom protective cases, which is why we take a hard line with companies creating and selling fake cases, as well as those infringing on our patents and trademarks. Counterfeit products damage our reputation for delivering premium quality products because many consumers aren’t aware that they purchased a fake OtterBox. If a deal seems to be too good to be true, it probably is.”



11 Comments

pazuzu 11 Years · 1728 comments

If the fake OtterBox don't fit, you must acquit.

wizard69 21 Years · 13358 comments

[quote name="Bageljoey" url="/t/159140/otterbox-secures-2m-court-victory-over-counterfeiters#post_2383062"]When you can't innovate, litigate¡[/quote] Innovate is exactly what Otter box did in this case. This usage of the patent and trademark system is exactly what the system is designed to do, protect the innovator from the ripoff artists.

right_said_fred 17 Years · 805 comments

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bageljoey 

When you can't innovate, litigate¡

but if you can and do innovate - don't litigate  ? that makes sense

suddenly newton 14 Years · 13819 comments

Somebody post photos of rugged PDAs with the caption "LOL @ OTTERBOX". /s