Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple bought retail uniforms from Chinese firm sanctioned for forced labor

Some Apple Store uniforms may have been sourced from Esquel

Apple has previously bought clothing for Apple Store uniforms from a subsidiary of a company that the US Government is alleging violated human rights in China's Xinjiang region.

Following Tim Cook saying to the House of Judiciary that Apple will not tolerate the use of forced labor in its business or any part of its supply chain, documents have shown that the company has previously bought from a subsidiary of Esquel. Changji Esquel Textile is currently facing sanctions for alleged human rights violations, including forced labor.

"Esquel is not a direct supplier to Apple but our suppliers do use cotton from their facilities in Guangzhou and Vietnam," an Apple spokesperson told The Guardian. "We have confirmed no Apple supplier sources cotton from Xinjiang and there are no plans for future sourcing of cotton from the region."

The Guardian reports that Apple's spokesperson declined to say where future cotton supplies would come from. The newspaper also notes that there is no cotton farming in Guangzhou, and that Esquel does not appear to farm cotton in Vietnam.

Apple is no longer listed as a major customer on Esquel's website, but the two firms have reportedly worked together for many years. It's believed that the clothing listed in shipping records were uniforms for Apple Store staff.

In 2014, Apple and Esquel together agreed to produce what were being described as more sustainable uniforms, using recycled cotton waste.

Speaking at the antitrust hearing in Washington, Tim Cook called forced labour "abhorrent." He said that Apple "wouldn't tolerate it...We would terminate a supplier relationship if it was found."



11 Comments

randominternetperson 8 Years · 3101 comments

The the story here is that Apple does what it says it does.  Or arey the supposed to stop doing business with companies before there is an allegation of impropriety at the parent company?  The corporate version of Minority Report pre-crime?

Rayz2016 8 Years · 6957 comments

The the story here is that Apple does what it says it does.  Or arey the supposed to stop doing business with companies before there is an allegation of impropriety at the parent company?  The corporate version of Minority Report pre-crime?

I can’t really pass judgement here because I have no idea who made my underpants. 


Yeah, it’s Ding Apple Month again …

leavingthebigg 11 Years · 1291 comments

Thankfully Apple is going EXACTLY what Ztim Cook! 👏🎉🎊🎈

macxpress 16 Years · 5915 comments

Why is it that The Guardian always has to publish articles that just shit all over Apple? What bug do they have up their ass for Apple?

Beats 4 Years · 3073 comments

Cue the "Apple hires slaves!!" meme.