Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple faces fresh USITC investigation over alleged Screen Sharing, AirPlay Mirroring patent infringement

Last updated

The U.S. International Trade Commission has declared that it has launched an investigation of many of Apple's present and past products that use Screen Sharing and AirPlay Mirroring, after complaints from a company and its licensing subsidiary that develops cross-platform remote access solutions.

The investigation was reportedly launched in response to complaints from Aqua Connect, and Strategic Technology Partners — both of Orange, Calif. Strategic Technology Partners is wholly-owned by Aqua Connect, and was spun-off from the parent company solely for the purpose of "holding its patents in a dedicated subsidiary."

A Reuters report claims that the products listed are "certain Apple Mac computers, iPhones, iPads, iPods, and Apple TV" according to the USITC.

The pair of companies launched a suit on October 10, regarding Aqua Connect's remote desktop and terminal server application. Aqua Connect claims that Apple "worked closely" on development and sales of the product until early 2011.

In July 2011, Apple launched Lion, and included Screen Sharing for the first time. Aqua Connect believes that the feature uses Aqua Connect's patented technology. The company also believes that AirPlay Mirroring uses the same technology base, and is named in the suit as well.

The patents cited are RE46,386 titled "Updating a user session in a mach-derived computer system environment" and 8,924,502 called "System, method and computer program product for updating a user session in a mach-derived system environment."

Not clear is how Apple Remote Desktop, a software package that was launched in 2002 and is more full-featured than Screen Sharing or AirPlay Mirroring, may play into the suit. Aqua Connect was founded in 2007, five years after Apple Remote Desktop shipped.

Aqua Connect claims that Apple's previous way of doing things was "rudimentary screen sharing functionality" and that the current implementation violates core patents held by the patent-holding subsidiary.

The suit seeks an enjoinment of Apple using the two patents cited in the suit, a judgement and order requiring compensatory damages, and a finding that Apple has willfully violated the patents in question.

While it is not clear if the remote access patents are what Aqua Connect and Strategic Technology Partners have complained about, it seems likely. The lawsuit is case number 8:17-cv-1762 in the Southern California Federal Court system.

USITC examinations can take some time before they are resolved, with the average case taking well more than a year, and sometimes spanning up to three years.



12 Comments

mknelson 9 Years · 1148 comments

These are very generic company names. The top search results for both are probably not the relevant companies:
https://www.aquaconnectweb.com
http://www.strategictechtexas.com

Any idea what the plaintiffs actually do?

Mike Wuerthele 8 Years · 6906 comments

mknelson said:
These are very generic company names. The top search results for both are probably not the relevant companies:
https://www.aquaconnectweb.com
http://www.strategictechtexas.com

Any idea what the plaintiffs actually do?

Getting there. I've already added more data to the story.

viclauyyc 10 Years · 847 comments

Did the company ever heard of something call MS Remote Desktop?

manfred zorn 10 Years · 28 comments

Looks like they licensed the Microsoft RDP protocol for the Mac OS X, when Mac (and Unix) were already using different protocols (and tools) for a long time.

viclauyyc 10 Years · 847 comments

mknelson said:
These are very generic company names. The top search results for both are probably not the relevant companies:
https://www.aquaconnectweb.com
http://www.strategictechtexas.com

Any idea what the plaintiffs actually do?
Getting there. I've already added more data to the story.
http://www.aquaconnect.net/

Reverse phone number search