Daniel Eran DilgerThe patent, pertaining to low resolution previews of video that are displayed while recording full quality video, was successfully used by Kodak to reach mobile-related licensing agreements with Samsung and LG over the past two years worth $864 million, according to a report by Bloomberg.
Because the patent relates to essentially every modern mobile phone that includes a camera, Apple and RIM were seen as prime targets for similar agreements. However, Apple and RIM argued that the patent was invalid because it was an "obvious variation of an earlier invention," and the ITC judge agreed.
The report noted that if the commission overturns the judge's ruling, the judge would recommend that all affected devices be blocked from US import, a move that would kill domestic distribution of virtually all BlackBerry models and all iPhones.
Most patent cases involve a plea to block imports with the ITC, a move that greatly leverages the importance of the case, given that virtually all electronics are now being imported from Far East assemblers. Virtually every mobile manufacturer is now engaged in a web of intellectual property lawsuits, many of which include demands that the ITC block all imports of the challenged devices.
RIM and Apple are both suing Kodak, with RIM filing a federal civil suit challenging the validity of other Kodak patents while Apple is suing Kodak directly for patent infringement in a trial that begins the end of January.
Kodak's setback caused the company's stock to fall 8.6 percent after the ruling was announced. Once a leader in the now dying world of chemical photography, the company is seeking to transition toward digital imaging and hopes to use its portfolio of more than a thousand patents related to imaging to earn royalties that can fund that shift.
The imploding demand for Kodak's traditional film products has slashed the company's revenues nearly in half in the last five years to $7.6 billion in 2009.
Charles Martin
Malcolm Owen
William Gallagher
Christine McKee
Wesley Hilliard
Andrew Orr
34 Comments
1 down, 4,659 to go ... yiippieeee!
I wonder what their patent portfolio is worth? Apple could takeover Kodak for a couple of billion.
I wonder what their patent portfolio is worth? Apple could takeover Kodak for a couple of billion.
The problem is probably that most of their patents do not pertain to modern digital photography.
I wonder what their patent portfolio is worth?
Don't know a lot about company vauation and such but with revenues of $7.9 billion and a market cap of only $1.9 billion, how do these numbers work?
Does this show they have a lot of licensing they collect on?
Don't know a lot about company vauation and such but with revenues of $7.9 billion and a market cap of only $1.9 billion, how do these numbers work?
Does this show they have a lot of licensing they collect on?
Revenues are before profit so if the company has a bunch of debt, or isnt profitable, then that 7.9 billion means the company value stays the same. Basically they have a lot coming in and as much or more going out. They are effectively at break even or worse, for a company this age this is called "going broke". Considering the last quarter they had a LOSS of $43 million - yeah "going broke." is quite correct.