Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Time uses iPhone to shoot magazine covers for 'Firsts' documentary series

Last updated

Time Magazine selected iPhone as its photography tool of choice for the upcoming "Firsts: Women Who Are Changing The World," a multi-platform documentary magazine series and companion book featuring influential women.

As detailed by Kira Pollack, Director of Photography and Visual Enterprise at Time, the magazine contracted Brazilian photographer Luisa Dörr to shoot the spread with her iPhone. With work showcasing her native Brazil, Dörr was discovered through her Instagram feed, the bio portion of which reads, "All photos made with the iPhone."

Pollack invited the photographer to apply her unique talent to Time's ambitious documentary series. Armed only with an iPhone and minimal field equipment, like a bounce reflector, Dörr traveled the U.S. to photograph her vision of some of the most influential women alive.

Photographer Luisa Drr photographs Oprah Winfrey with an iPhone in 2016. | Source: Time

Over the course of the year-long project, Drr used personal iPhones to capture portraits of 46 subjects including Hillary Rodham Clinton, Oprah Winfrey, Janet Yellen, Selena Gomez, Serena Williams, Melinda Gates, Cindy Sherman and other notable names. An iPhone 5 captured the first images in the series, shots of GM CEO Mary Barra, before Drr moved on to an iPhone 6, 6s Plus and finally iPhone 7.

In an interview, Dörr explains that because iPhone is always in her pocket, it lets her capture great pictures anywhere, anytime. The alternative is lugging around bulky professional camera equipment. Further, shooting with an iPhone puts subjects at ease as the process is less intrusive, Dörr says.

"I like the simplicity of how these pictures are made. But the best part is that as a photographer, you feel extremely light and free. It is almost as if I can make pictures with my hand," Dörr said. "There's no noise, gadgets, tools or plugs— just the subject and myself."

The women featured in "Firsts," many of whom are no stranger to photo shoots, were surprised that Time chose a relatively young photographer bearing little more than an iPhone, but the results speak volumes. For the "Firsts" series, most shoots took about five to ten minutes, with the shortest coming in at around two minutes.

Apple's smartphones are often used in professional photo shoots. In the past, magazines like Vogue and Sports Illustrated, the latter being a Time publication, have opted to use iPhone to gain a unique perspective on their subject.



23 Comments

lkrupp 10521 comments · 19 Years

It's articles like this one that make me scratch my head. We are constantly being told by the usual suspects here that the iPhone camera is substandard, years behind, not enough pixels. Sites like c|net declare pictures taken with a Samsung phone are better than iPhone pictures. Then an article like this one comes along and PROFESSIONAL photographers choose the iPhone for their work. Of course the rebuttals claim Apple is paying professional photographers big money to use the iPhone and that the iPhone takes shitty pictures.  Is Apple paying everybody off? Are we living in an Apple controlled Matrix?

Or are the usual suspects here just idiots spewing diarrhea from their pie holes?

suddenly newton 13819 comments · 14 Years

Nobody makes better cameras than a company that makes a line of internet-connected refrigerators.

Soli 9981 comments · 9 Years

lkrupp said:
It's articles like this one that make me scratch my head. We are constantly being told by the usual suspects here that the iPhone camera is substandard, years behind, not enough pixels. Sites like c|net declare pictures taken with a Samsung phone are better than iPhone pictures. Then an article like this one comes along and PROFESSIONAL photographers choose the iPhone for their work. Of course the rebuttals claim Apple is paying professional photographers big money to use the iPhone and that the iPhone takes shitty pictures.  Is Apple paying everybody off? Are we living in an Apple controlled Matrix?

Or are the usual suspects here just idiots spewing diarrhea from their pie holes?

And in some isolated, technical aspect that may very well be true-ish, but the iPhone also has the most HW adapters to enhance picture quality, but even if you don't use that they still have the best SW editing apps, but you could always offload to another system and device after the photo was taken, and even that is inconsequential when it comes to being a good photographer.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nT6eaBm82bQ

polymnia 1080 comments · 15 Years

lkrupp said:
It's articles like this one that make me scratch my head. We are constantly being told by the usual suspects here that the iPhone camera is substandard, years behind, not enough pixels. Sites like c|net declare pictures taken with a Samsung phone are better than iPhone pictures. Then an article like this one comes along and PROFESSIONAL photographers choose the iPhone for their work. Of course the rebuttals claim Apple is paying professional photographers big money to use the iPhone and that the iPhone takes shitty pictures.  Is Apple paying everybody off? Are we living in an Apple controlled Matrix?

Or are the usual suspects here just idiots spewing diarrhea from their pie holes?

I'm not a professional photographer. But I'm certainly an enthusiast. And I have been paid for editorial photography in a prior freelance period of my life. I edit photography which accounts for over 50% of my freelance graphic design business. I contribute to stock agencies. 

I have sold sold a couple images shot on iPhone through stock agencies.

in fact, many stock agencies have iOS apps with image uploaders built in. They are actively encouraging iPhone photographers to submit. 

Especialy now that iOS can capture RAW files, there is no reason certain types of photography cannot be competently shot with iPhone. 

I love shooting RAW with the iPhone and processing the image with my professional imaging software. The results can be amazing. 

iqatedo 1812 comments · 21 Years

polymnia said:
lkrupp said:
It's articles like this one that make me scratch my head. We are constantly being told by the usual suspects here that the iPhone camera is substandard, years behind, not enough pixels. Sites like c|net declare pictures taken with a Samsung phone are better than iPhone pictures. Then an article like this one comes along and PROFESSIONAL photographers choose the iPhone for their work. Of course the rebuttals claim Apple is paying professional photographers big money to use the iPhone and that the iPhone takes shitty pictures.  Is Apple paying everybody off? Are we living in an Apple controlled Matrix?

Or are the usual suspects here just idiots spewing diarrhea from their pie holes?
I'm not a professional photographer. But I'm certainly an enthusiast. And I have been paid for editorial photography in a prior freelance period of my life. I edit photography which accounts for over 50% of my freelance graphic design business. I contribute to stock agencies. 

I have sold sold a couple images shot on iPhone through stock agencies.

in fact, many stock agencies have iOS apps with image uploaders built in. They are actively encouraging iPhone photographers to submit. 

Especialy now that iOS can capture RAW files, there is no reason certain types of photography cannot be competently shot with iPhone. 

I love shooting RAW with the iPhone and processing the image with my professional imaging software. The results can be amazing. 

I'd forgotten about the RAW capture capability but also, I don't have professional software now. Would it be worth trying and using Pixelmator? (I have previously done a fair amount of image processing.) I recently set video capture to 4k and am blown away by the results.