Affiliate Disclosure
If you buy through our links, we may get a commission. Read our ethics policy.

Apple calling everything that it released 'intelligent' won't help it catch up

L-R: Tim Cook, Jeff Williams, Dr. Sumbul Desai

After practically disdaining the phrase "artificial intelligence," Apple first compromised with "Apple Intelligence," but now it's overusing the term and applying it even to devices that won't run the new feature.

There comes a point when you say a word so often that it loses meaning, and Apple approached that with "intelligent" in the "It's Glowtime" event's launch of the new Apple Watch. It was fewer than a dozen times but over that short period, it felt like Apple had told its presenters to hammer that point home.

Don't even begin trying to count how often it was said about the iPhones. The iPhone 16 introduction was even interrupted by an extended segment about Apple Intelligence, but then at least that device is getting that feature.

So is the iPhone 16 Pro range, and so is the Mac although that wasn't discussed in the event.

The Apple Watch Series 10, though, is not getting Apple Intelligence. But the word or its variant still got about one mention for every two minutes of the launch segment's running time.

Including Tim Cook at the start of the event, the Apple Watch segment featured five presenters — and three of them wedged in "intelligent" or "intelligence."

For comparison, 2023's launch of the Apple Watch Series 9 ran for just over 26 minutes. And the word was not used once.

Apple has its own language

Apple used to have this thing about using its own terminology instead of anyone else's. MagSafe instead of Qi, for instance, or "Retina display."

In this case, Apple had its own term for artificial intelligence and it had used it for at least a decade. Plus "Machine Learning" was more accurate a description than AI, and unquestionably Apple was far ahead with it though specifically adding neural engine cores to its processors.

Only, it seems someone questioned it. By late 2023, Apple was perceived to be far behind the rest of the industry. That was partly because the rest of the industry was publicly making generative AI apps like ChatGPT.

But it was also because every other player in the technology industry was talking about AI. In reality, Apple was too, but it wasn't using that term.

Whether pressure drove Apple to play catch up, or whether Apple's Craig Federighi ignited it because of his own AI interest, Apple has spent 2024 talking up AI.

Even as we near the official releases of macOS Sequoia and iOS 18, Apple has been more talking about what it now calls Apple Intelligence than it has been releasing much.

Ignoring betas and release promises, just looking at Apple's talking seems to tell a tale. Initially it stuck to "Machine Learning" for all the best reasons, until it realized it was being undermined by the use of the term "artificial intelligence."

So Apple tries to get back in the game, linguistically, and also set out a stall for why its AI is different, by coining the term Apple Intelligence. It did that at WWDC 2024, and it's one of those terms that sounds poor when you first hear it, but then you get used to it remarkably quickly.

It's no surprise that the term was used throughout the iPhone launches, and it will be again when the next Macs are released. There's no criticism about Apple using its term to describe its feature.

But when it's also being applied to a device like the Apple Watch that very specifically is not getting Apple Intelligence, then it jars. Then it's saying more than it intends to.

It's saying that Apple still doesn't think users associate it with AI. It's sounding like Apple is a bit desperate.



30 Comments

domicinator 11 Years · 14 comments

I know what will help--write a big long article about how mad you are!

araquen 9 Years · 13 comments

Again, Apple is not selling AI as a product, and folks have got to just stop with this. Apple Intelligence is not Apple-branded ChatGPT.

Apple Intelligence is low level (I think that’s the term) functionality that is being deployed across devices (over time) intended to enhance the user experience of those devices. It is intended to enhance what Siri is supposed to be doing. It is intended, eventually, to enhance the algorithms for services Apple customers buy.

So really there is no “catching up” because no other AI service is running “headless” like this. Every other AI is a product to be sold in and of itself.

For instance, Midjourney steals art to generate art for people who type in a few prompts. Apple Intelligence will, say, randomize a brush stroke effect to help your existing photo composition look more like a painting, or help you frame a pleasing photo composition. Instead of AI creating music compositions, Apple intelligence may introduce realistic defects into your Garage Band or Logic Pro compositions giving them a feeling that actual musicians played the notes, or that the recording came from vinyl, or make recommendations based on common music theories.

I see Apple Intelligence enhancing, if not replacing, Genius in Apple Music.

When we think of Apple Intelligence, it should always be with a “yes and” mindset with the “and” being a product or service Apple offers. Apple Intelligence doing preliminary diagnostics in Disk First Aid to assist in tech triage, or parse console logs to help narrow down an issue. Apple Intelligence turning Siri into your own personal “JARVIS” instead of it being a passive entity. Apple Intelligence refining your Home automation. Apple Intelligence connecting disparate data points from your various health apps to provide holistic feedback on the state of your fitness. Apple Intelligence enhancing health trends, or automatically micro-adjusting goals based on your current fitness levels. We’ve actually seen these pitches in the last two keynote presentations. It’s always been how Apple intelligence is going to make an Apple hardware product more functional.

Apple is NOT a software company. They sell hardware. Their software and services are intended to make their hardware offerings look more appealing. Apple Intelligence is Apple’s “next step” in Apple setting their hardware apart. Apple’s goal with Apple intelligence is to put the “smart” in the smart device.

There is no other AI product I am aware of that has the goal of enhancing someone’s device. every other AI product is selling AI itself as the product to do creative things for people, instead of providing additional tools for creators.

freeassociate2 3 Years · 217 comments

I know what will help--write a big long article about how mad you are!

Agreed. Reads like a half-baked thread comment, not a well-developed opinion piece. And that title is bog-awful inaccurate clicky-bait.

While there isn’t yet a WatchOS 11.1 beta that has specific Apple Intelligence integrations, that doesn’t mean that there won’t be. Odds are there will be, in fact.

For now however, the references in the event video closely track Apple Intelligence features that the Watch gets from pairing with an iPhone. Which they all do. So overall the article feels a bit willfully misleading. 


Additionally, the article it doesn’t address the title premise very well, if at all. What exactly is Apple catching up to? What real benefits should we be seeing?

Overall the state of LLM AI/ML is a hot mess that makes USB-C compatibility look well thought out by comparison. And it makes sense that Apple would want to promote and differentiate their usage from that of the problematic ChatBorgs.

Article Rating: Unsatisfactory. 

P.S. That article photo — that’s the best expressions ya’ll could get from the video??!! C’mon folks … that just looks like you’re trying to make those execs look bad. Cook at least looks like you would expect him to look in a presentation. 

twolf2919 2 Years · 149 comments

Echoing what @araquen  wrote, the author has no basis in fact to state (in the title) "Apple calling everything that it released 'intelligent' won't help it catch up" as there is no other company that is doing what Apple is doing with regards to AI.  Who does Apple need to catch up to?  Apple is infusing its existing features/functions with useful AI - and that includes the Apple Watch: just because Apple isn't running generative AI models on the watch itself doesn't mean that device's functionality can't be made more intelligent (via remote use of AI models if necessary).

DAalseth 6 Years · 3067 comments

I agree with the author but it’s not just Apple. Calling things “Intelligent” has become like “organic” or “vegan” or if you go back a few years “computerized”. It’s becoming a word that is getting applied to everything and so is beginning to mean nothing.